we obtain
EFn
Y - βn
σn
-Σ3κn + o(κn,λn),
f 17 y - βn V
EFn [к σ .
f 17 y - βn 73
EFn [k~τr).
P ff Y - βn y'
EFn l σ
1- 2Σ4λn + o(κn,λn),
κn - 3Σ3κn + o(κn, λn),
3+λn - 12Σ4λn + o(κn,λn).
Letting ( m 1 ,m 2 ,m 3) = Wm ( Y ; θn ), this results in
EFn (m 1) = -λn(2ς4 + d) + o(κn, λn)
EFn (m2) = Kn + O(Kn, λn)
EFn (m13) = λn + O(Kn, λn)
Note that, from (20),
_ 1 E [(Z4 - 6Z2 + 3)Pc(Z)]
= 12 E [ZPc(Z)]
= -2Σ4,
and thus EFn [rn 1] = o(κn, λn). Since κn = k/yfn and λn = l∕√n, we obtain
b = lim nEEFn [ Wm ( Y ; θn )] =
n→∞
from which it is straightforward that
+ k2 l2
δ=bv+b=_+-.
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research (grant
G.0366.01) is gratefully acknowledged.
37
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The Impact of Individual Investment Behavior for Retirement Welfare: Evidence from the United States and Germany
3. CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR AGRICULTURAL POLICY
4. Citizenship
5. The WTO and the Cartagena Protocol: International Policy Coordination or Conflict?
6. Regional specialisation in a transition country - Hungary
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Short report "About a rare cause of primary hyperparathyroidism"