we obtain
EFn
Y - βn
σn
-Σ3κn + o(κn,λn),
f 17 y - βn V
EFn [к σ .
f 17 y - βn 73
EFn [k~τr).
P ff Y - βn y'
EFn l σ
1- 2Σ4λn + o(κn,λn),
κn - 3Σ3κn + o(κn, λn),
3+λn - 12Σ4λn + o(κn,λn).
Letting ( m 1 ,m 2 ,m 3) = Wm ( Y ; θn ), this results in
EFn (m 1) = -λn(2ς4 + d) + o(κn, λn)
EFn (m2) = Kn + O(Kn, λn)
EFn (m13) = λn + O(Kn, λn)
Note that, from (20),
_ 1 E [(Z4 - 6Z2 + 3)Pc(Z)]
= 12 E [ZPc(Z)]
= -2Σ4,
and thus EFn [rn 1] = o(κn, λn). Since κn = k/yfn and λn = l∕√n, we obtain
b = lim nEEFn [ Wm ( Y ; θn )] =
n→∞
from which it is straightforward that
+ k2 l2
δ=bv+b=_+-.
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research (grant
G.0366.01) is gratefully acknowledged.
37
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
3. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
4. Income Taxation when Markets are Incomplete
5. ALTERNATIVE TRADE POLICIES
6. Trade and Empire, 1700-1870
7. Uncertain Productivity Growth and the Choice between FDI and Export
8. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective
9. Review of “The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas”
10. Monetary Policy News and Exchange Rate Responses: Do Only Surprises Matter?