Hence
b = lim nEEFs [ s ( Y ; β0 ,n,σ 0 ,n, 0)]
n→∞
0
=e 0
\ 1 -∏
\ 2 π
The information matrix is
J = E [s (y ;0, 1, 0) s (y ;0, 1, 0)' ]
1 0 Eφ[u(u2 — 1)I(u > 0)] \
■ 2 Eφ[(u2 — 1)21(u> 0)]
■ ■ Eφ[(u2 — 1)21(u> 0)] J
10φ(0) \
021 ,
φ(0) 1 1
wherefrom δ = b,J 1 b = π-1 e2.
2π
C.3 Tilted normal alternative
Expanding f(y; β, σ, κ, λ) around κ =0andλ = 0 gives
f( У ;β,σ,κ,λ ) = 1 φ ( u )
σ
κλ
1 + ^( u — 3 u ) + 24( u — 6 u + 3)
+ o(κ, λ),
from which the moments given in (15) follow. The score function, evaluated
at κ = λ =0, is
s(y; β, σ, 0, 0)
σ u \
u2 -1
σ
u3 — 3 u
6
u4 — 6u 2+3
\ 24 /
The information matrix is
J = E [s ( y ; β, 1, 0, 0) s ( y ; β, 1, 0, 0) ']
/ 1 0 0 0 \
0200
= 0 0 1 0 ’
V 0 0 0 24 J
35
More intriguing information
1. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads2. Optimal Taxation of Capital Income in Models with Endogenous Fertility
3. Accurate, fast and stable denoising source separation algorithms
4. Computational Experiments with the Fuzzy Love and Romance
5. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
6. Weak and strong sustainability indicators, and regional environmental resources
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment
10. The Response of Ethiopian Grain Markets to Liberalization