Unpublished appendix
Table S1 (unpublished): Determinants of exporting by industries, UK 1996-2004 (cf, Equation 3)
|
Industries: Independent variables: — |
____________AGF__________ |
_____________FBT_____________ |
___________TCL__________ | ||||||
|
∂p/ ∂x |
z-value |
Means |
∂p/ ∂x |
z-value |
Means |
∂p/ ∂x |
z-value |
Means | |
|
10-19 employees (t-1) |
-0.058 |
-2.58 |
0.178 |
-0.113 |
-3.45 |
0.207 |
0.192 |
6.01 |
0.152 |
|
20-49 employees (t-1) |
0.296 |
8.42 |
0.131 |
-0.100 |
-3.26 |
0.308 |
0.442 |
19.66 |
0.283 |
|
50-199 employees (t-1) |
0.316 |
9.35 |
0.172 |
0.138 |
3.92 |
0.223 |
0.503 |
25.22 |
0.273 |
|
200+ employees (t-1) |
0.557 |
12.93 |
0.073 |
0.280 |
6.57 |
0.121 |
0.419 |
28.08 |
0.108 |
|
ln labour productivity (t-1) |
0.030 |
3.89 |
4.030 |
0.137 |
11.76 |
4.043 |
0.214 |
14.82 |
3.969 |
|
Intangible assets (t-1) >0 |
-0.043 |
-1.95 |
0.126 |
0.142 |
5.02 |
0.220 |
0.109 |
2.94 |
0.103 |
|
ln age (t-1) |
0.076 |
7.74 |
2.921 |
0.008 |
0.68 |
2.801 |
0.062 |
5.16 |
2.912 |
|
North East |
-0.160 |
-14.66 |
0.031 |
-0.153 |
-2.63 |
0.044 |
0.232 |
2.68 |
0.007 |
|
Yorkshire-Humberside |
-0.101 |
-4.94 |
0.047 |
-0.041 |
-0.85 |
0.097 |
0.329 |
11.18 |
0.100 |
|
North West |
-0.162 |
-14.68 |
0.048 |
0.115 |
1.98 |
0.060 |
0.114 |
2.26 |
0.146 |
|
West Midlands |
-0.159 |
-14.36 |
0.046 |
0.570 |
15.16 |
0.090 |
0.222 |
5.25 |
0.112 |
|
East Midlands |
-0.068 |
-3.63 |
0.132 |
0.149 |
2.61 |
0.066 |
0.330 |
10.65 |
0.144 |
|
South West |
-0.166 |
-13.98 |
0.093 |
0.185 |
3.30 |
0.074 |
0.316 |
9.66 |
0.026 |
|
Eastern England |
-0.159 |
-11.77 |
0.176 |
0.157 |
3.02 |
0.092 |
-0.011 |
-0.13 |
0.035 |
|
London |
-0.101 |
-5.47 |
0.065 |
0.083 |
1.86 |
0.237 |
0.302 |
8.10 |
0.222 |
|
Scotland |
-0.124 |
-8.55 |
0.087 |
0.118 |
2.40 |
0.113 |
0.159 |
3.23 |
0.132 |
|
Wales |
-0.145 |
-12.25 |
0.022 |
-0.100 |
-1.68 |
0.038 |
0.297 |
8.27 |
0.021 |
|
Northern Ireland |
_ |
_ |
_ |
0.487 |
1.82 |
0.001 |
-0.259 |
-1.42 |
0.003 |
|
No. of Obs. |
2303 |
2522 |
2487 | ||||||
Notes: Refer to Table 2 for details of industry group codes. ∂p/ ∂x are marginal effects for each independent variable on the propensity to export (for binary
variables, these are the effects of a discrete change from 0 to 1) and their corresponding Z statistics. Missing results for any region (e.g. Northern Ireland) is due to
too few observations (leading to estimation problems); the South East region comprises the benchmark. SIC industry dummies were included but not reported in the
table.
42
More intriguing information
1. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach2. Demographic Features, Beliefs And Socio-Psychological Impact Of Acne Vulgaris Among Its Sufferers In Two Towns In Nigeria
3. AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION UNDER NAFTA: REPORTING ON THE REPORT CARD
4. STIMULATING COOPERATION AMONG FARMERS IN A POST-SOCIALIST ECONOMY: LESSONS FROM A PUBLIC-PRIVATE MARKETING PARTNERSHIP IN POLAND
5. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation
6. The name is absent
7. Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent