Unpublished appendix
Table S1 (unpublished): Determinants of exporting by industries, UK 1996-2004 (cf, Equation 3)
|
Industries: Independent variables: — |
____________AGF__________ |
_____________FBT_____________ |
___________TCL__________ | ||||||
|
∂p/ ∂x |
z-value |
Means |
∂p/ ∂x |
z-value |
Means |
∂p/ ∂x |
z-value |
Means | |
|
10-19 employees (t-1) |
-0.058 |
-2.58 |
0.178 |
-0.113 |
-3.45 |
0.207 |
0.192 |
6.01 |
0.152 |
|
20-49 employees (t-1) |
0.296 |
8.42 |
0.131 |
-0.100 |
-3.26 |
0.308 |
0.442 |
19.66 |
0.283 |
|
50-199 employees (t-1) |
0.316 |
9.35 |
0.172 |
0.138 |
3.92 |
0.223 |
0.503 |
25.22 |
0.273 |
|
200+ employees (t-1) |
0.557 |
12.93 |
0.073 |
0.280 |
6.57 |
0.121 |
0.419 |
28.08 |
0.108 |
|
ln labour productivity (t-1) |
0.030 |
3.89 |
4.030 |
0.137 |
11.76 |
4.043 |
0.214 |
14.82 |
3.969 |
|
Intangible assets (t-1) >0 |
-0.043 |
-1.95 |
0.126 |
0.142 |
5.02 |
0.220 |
0.109 |
2.94 |
0.103 |
|
ln age (t-1) |
0.076 |
7.74 |
2.921 |
0.008 |
0.68 |
2.801 |
0.062 |
5.16 |
2.912 |
|
North East |
-0.160 |
-14.66 |
0.031 |
-0.153 |
-2.63 |
0.044 |
0.232 |
2.68 |
0.007 |
|
Yorkshire-Humberside |
-0.101 |
-4.94 |
0.047 |
-0.041 |
-0.85 |
0.097 |
0.329 |
11.18 |
0.100 |
|
North West |
-0.162 |
-14.68 |
0.048 |
0.115 |
1.98 |
0.060 |
0.114 |
2.26 |
0.146 |
|
West Midlands |
-0.159 |
-14.36 |
0.046 |
0.570 |
15.16 |
0.090 |
0.222 |
5.25 |
0.112 |
|
East Midlands |
-0.068 |
-3.63 |
0.132 |
0.149 |
2.61 |
0.066 |
0.330 |
10.65 |
0.144 |
|
South West |
-0.166 |
-13.98 |
0.093 |
0.185 |
3.30 |
0.074 |
0.316 |
9.66 |
0.026 |
|
Eastern England |
-0.159 |
-11.77 |
0.176 |
0.157 |
3.02 |
0.092 |
-0.011 |
-0.13 |
0.035 |
|
London |
-0.101 |
-5.47 |
0.065 |
0.083 |
1.86 |
0.237 |
0.302 |
8.10 |
0.222 |
|
Scotland |
-0.124 |
-8.55 |
0.087 |
0.118 |
2.40 |
0.113 |
0.159 |
3.23 |
0.132 |
|
Wales |
-0.145 |
-12.25 |
0.022 |
-0.100 |
-1.68 |
0.038 |
0.297 |
8.27 |
0.021 |
|
Northern Ireland |
_ |
_ |
_ |
0.487 |
1.82 |
0.001 |
-0.259 |
-1.42 |
0.003 |
|
No. of Obs. |
2303 |
2522 |
2487 | ||||||
Notes: Refer to Table 2 for details of industry group codes. ∂p/ ∂x are marginal effects for each independent variable on the propensity to export (for binary
variables, these are the effects of a discrete change from 0 to 1) and their corresponding Z statistics. Missing results for any region (e.g. Northern Ireland) is due to
too few observations (leading to estimation problems); the South East region comprises the benchmark. SIC industry dummies were included but not reported in the
table.
42
More intriguing information
1. The Impact of Individual Investment Behavior for Retirement Welfare: Evidence from the United States and Germany2. Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries: Evidence from Hungary
3. Does South Africa Have the Potential and Capacity to Grow at 7 Per Cent?: A Labour Market Perspective
4. Technological progress, organizational change and the size of the Human Resources Department
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent