Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence



perspective. The common procedure is to test whether or not a limited num-
ber of mainline cyclical indicators can explain significant degrees of the wage
variation. One such indicator may be output deviations from trend, selected
to capture business cycle activity. If output deviations are strongly correlated,
say, with a 5-7 year wage cycle, and if that frequency range represents a dom-
inant explanation of wage movements, we would be inclined to lean towards a
business cycle explanation of wage cyclicality. Of course, we have a choice of
proxies for the business cycle and each would be expected to offer greater or
lesser со-variations with different wage cycles. Finding statistical support for
business cycle effects may not complete the story, however. Shorter and longer
frequency ranges, exhibiting strong correlation with other economic phenom-
ena, may also add significantly to explained wage variation.

Suppose that the peaks and troughs of an influential constituent cycle of
the wage time series coincide with the respective turning points of the selected
business cycle measure. Then we would conclude that the wage is both pro-
cyclical and in phase with the cycle. But the two series may be highly pro-
cyclical and out of phase. For example, in common with time series analyses,
adjustment impediments associated with bargaining may lead to consistent
phase lags of the wage to the cycle. Or the two series may be partly in phase
and partly out of phase.

We apply and develop frequency domain techniques to offer detailed in-
sights into these aspects of wage cyclicality. We Frst consider ‘explained vari-
ance’ from a frequency domain perspective. This is achieved via the
squared
coherency
measure (sc) which assesses the degree of linear relationship between
cyclical components of two series
Xt and Tj, frequency by frequency. The sc
is dehned as

s÷> = 7⅜⅛τw 0s÷) ≤ ι,          (3)

jxω)jyω)

where fx(ω^) is the spectrum of the series Xt, and fyx(ω) is the cross-spectrum
for
Yt and Xt.6 Using this expression, we can decompose fy(ω) into and ex-

6The spectrum is the Fourier transform of the autocovariance function, and the cross-



More intriguing information

1. How Low Business Tax Rates Attract Multinational Headquarters: Municipality-Level Evidence from Germany
2. Proceedings from the ECFIN Workshop "The budgetary implications of structural reforms" - Brussels, 2 December 2005
3. Types of Cost in Inductive Concept Learning
4. The name is absent
5. Who is missing from higher education?
6. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity
7. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Text of a letter
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. Om Økonomi, matematik og videnskabelighed - et bud på provokation
14. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
15. The name is absent
16. Creating a 2000 IES-LFS Database in Stata
17. Graphical Data Representation in Bankruptcy Analysis
18. The name is absent
19. AMINO ACIDS SEQUENCE ANALYSIS ON COLLAGEN
20. Strategic Policy Options to Improve Irrigation Water Allocation Efficiency: Analysis on Egypt and Morocco