The name is absent



Hoban, ThomasJ.


Trends in Consumer Acceptance and Awareness of Biotechnology  7

Most consumers who participated had little
knowledge about biotechnology (or even tradi-
tional food production techniques for that matter).
Some said they had heard of a “new type of to-
mato” which had been in the news prior to the
focus groups. Most were very interested in the
subject and wanted to receive more information.
They generally asked for the same types of in-
formation as they would for any food. They
mainly wanted to know how foods produced
through biotechnology would taste and what they
would cost. Information on safety and nutrition of
specific products was also seen as important. Fo-
cus group participants were also most likely to
trust independent health organizations and uni-
versity scientists.

Influences on Public Acceptance of
Biotechnology

Additional analysis of the 1992 and 1994
surveys provides insights into the types of con-
sumers who will be most likely to accept products
of biotechnology. As with other food issues,
women generally had more questions and con-
cerns about biotechnology than men. However,
the majority of women still were positive on bio-
technology. Respondents with higher income
were more likely to find the products acceptable.
Those with more education were more likely to
accept biotechnology than respondents with less
education. Greater general interest in science and
technology was related to greater acceptance of
biotechnology.

Awareness and knowledge of biotechnology
generally has a major influence on acceptance of
products. Survey respondents who had read or
heard more about biotechnology were much more
likely to find the products acceptable than those
with less awareness. Similar patterns are evident
with increased interest in biotechnology. Confi-
dence in government and trust in information
sources prove to be very important. As confi-
dence and trust increased, consumers’ acceptance
Ofbiotechnology rose dramatically.

Figure 5. Amount Heard or Read about Biotechnology.

Nothing

A Little

Some

A Lot

Source: USDA 1992, GMA 1994, and FMI 1995.




More intriguing information

1. A Rare Case Of Fallopian Tube Cancer
2. Output Effects of Agri-environmental Programs of the EU
3. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The open method of co-ordination: Some remarks regarding old-age security within an enlarged European Union
7. The name is absent
8. The Economic Value of Basin Protection to Improve the Quality and Reliability of Potable Water Supply: Some Evidence from Ecuador
9. The name is absent
10. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -
11. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
12. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt
13. On s-additive robust representation of convex risk measures for unbounded financial positions in the presence of uncertainty about the market model
14. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. From music student to professional: the process of transition
18. SOME ISSUES CONCERNING SPECIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF OUTDOOR RECREATION DEMAND MODELS
19. PEER-REVIEWED FINAL EDITED VERSION OF ARTICLE PRIOR TO PUBLICATION
20. The name is absent