Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World



The investor minimizes his risk subject to the budget contraint E(Rk) = 1
and the return constraint E(R)
R*. The solution gives the efficient return
sharing rule.

The ratio A/Wq is crucial for risk measurement if 7 > -∞. Depending
on the investor, the ratio
A/Wq might be independent of Wq or not. Define

A* _ A R

W = W - 1 - 7 ’

Then

ʌ 1 - 7 /A*    Rλ7

e[F(r)] = --7⅛(- + -) .         (19)

Investors differ in terms of Wq /A* for 7 > -∞ resp. BWq for 7 = -∞
and the required expected return R*. Hence the sharing constants of two
investors differ because of differences in these parameters. Applying Lemma
1 shows that the sharing constant of an investor declines when Wq/A* resp.
BWq or the required expected return R* increases.

This proves

Proposition 5 ; Given the pricing kernel, the difference between the shar-
ing constants of investors i and j, (si
- s3), is monotonically increasing in
(W0j∕A* - Wo√A*) for 7 > -∞ resp. (BjW(p- - BW) for 7 = -∞ and
(R - R)■

Before we discuss the sharing rules of these investors, it is helpful to
understand the impact of
Wq/A* resp. BWq. The curvature of the risk
function,
-f(R)/f (R), similar to absolute risk aversion, increases monoton-
ically in
Wq/A* resp. BWq. Therefore we denote Wq/A* resp. BWq as the
investor’s risk sensitivity. With 1 > 7 > -∞, risk sensitivity is higher for

24



More intriguing information

1. PROFITABILITY OF ALFALFA HAY STORAGE USING PROBABILITIES: AN EXTENSION APPROACH
2. Sectoral specialisation in the EU a macroeconomic perspective
3. The name is absent
4. The economic value of food labels: A lab experiment on safer infant milk formula
5. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
6. Should informal sector be subsidised?
7. Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States
8. REVITALIZING FAMILY FARM AGRICULTURE
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent