The investor minimizes his risk subject to the budget contraint E(Rk) = 1
and the return constraint E(R) > R*. The solution gives the efficient return
sharing rule.
The ratio A/Wq is crucial for risk measurement if 7 > -∞. Depending
on the investor, the ratio A/Wq might be independent of Wq or not. Define
A* _ A R
W = W - 1 - 7 ’
Then
ʌ 1 - 7 /A* Rλ7
e[F(r)] = --7⅛(- + -) . (19)
Investors differ in terms of Wq /A* for 7 > -∞ resp. BWq for 7 = -∞
and the required expected return R*. Hence the sharing constants of two
investors differ because of differences in these parameters. Applying Lemma
1 shows that the sharing constant of an investor declines when Wq/A* resp.
BWq or the required expected return R* increases.
This proves
Proposition 5 ; Given the pricing kernel, the difference between the shar-
ing constants of investors i and j, (si - s3), is monotonically increasing in
(W0j∕A* - Wo√A*) for 7 > -∞ resp. (BjW(p- - BW) for 7 = -∞ and
(R - R)■
Before we discuss the sharing rules of these investors, it is helpful to
understand the impact of Wq/A* resp. BWq. The curvature of the risk
function, -f(R)/f (R), similar to absolute risk aversion, increases monoton-
ically in Wq/A* resp. BWq. Therefore we denote Wq/A* resp. BWq as the
investor’s risk sensitivity. With 1 > 7 > -∞, risk sensitivity is higher for
24
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues
5. Herman Melville and the Problem of Evil
6. The name is absent
7. Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States
8. Should informal sector be subsidised?
9. The name is absent
10. Imperfect competition and congestion in the City