Figure 2


bl) Investor i demands higher ex-
pected portfolio return. His shar-
ing rule is convex relative to that
of investor j such that R and Rj
intersect once.
b2) Investor i has a higher risk
sensitivity. His sharing rule is
convex relative to that of in-
vestor j such that both inter-
sect twice.
Proposition 6 is illustrated in Figure 2. If two investors i and j have
the same expected portfolio return and the same risk sensitivity, then their
portfolio returns are the same in every state. If investor i has a higher
risk sensitivity and/or demands a higher expected portfolio return, then her
sharing rule is convex relative to that of the other investor. The special cases
bl) and b2) will help to understand the intuition behind this result.
Proposition 6 bl) says that an investor i who ceteris paribus demands
a higher expected portfolio return than investor j chooses a portfolio such
that in the low states (Rj∙ < R1 ) her portfolio return is lower and in the high
states (Rj > R1 ) it is higher. Hence, a higher expected return forces her
26
More intriguing information
1. Group cooperation, inclusion and disaffected pupils: some responses to informal learning in the music classroom2. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region
3. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
4. I nnovative Surgical Technique in the Management of Vallecular Cyst
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Insecure Property Rights and Growth: The Roles of Appropriation Costs, Wealth Effects, and Heterogeneity
8. Assessing Economic Complexity with Input-Output Based Measures
9. Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?
10. The name is absent