Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World



and the EU-equilibrium become transparent when we assume HARA-based
risk functions.

5.2 HARA-Based Risk Functions

We assume that all investors have HARA-based risk functions with the same
7. We will show that more heterogeneity of investors raises the convexity of
the pricing kernel c(ε):

c(ε) -


π" (ε)

-τ' (e)


The convexity of the pricing kernel is essential for option pricing. Consider
two economies with pricing kernels πi (ε) and π2 (ε) such that the convexity
of the first pricing kernel is higher everywhere and the forward price of the
aggregate payoff-distribution is the same,
E[ε π1 (ε)] = E[επ2(ε)].Then based
upon a result of
Franke, Stapleton and Subrahmanyam (1999) proposition 8
shows that all European options on ε are more expensive under the more
convex pricing kernel πι (ε).

Proposition 8 : Let π1 (ε) and π2 (ε) be two forward pricing kernels with
the underlying asset’s forward price E
[επ1 (ε)] = E[επ2(ε)] being the same.
Assume that the convexity of
πi (ε) exceeds that of π2 (ε) for every ε. Then
all European options on ε are more expensive under
π1 (ε) than under π2 (ε).

Proof. See Appendix F.

Given the importance of the pricing kernel we investigate it in the risk-
value equilibrium. Two investors are said to be heterogeneous if their sharing
constants differ. The more they differ, the more convex or concave are the
relative sharing rules, the higher is the convexity of the pricing kernel as will

29



More intriguing information

1. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Institutions, and Fiscal Performance
5. The name is absent
6. Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?
7. The name is absent
8. IMPACTS OF EPA DAIRY WASTE REGULATIONS ON FARM PROFITABILITY
9. On Social and Market Sanctions in Deterring non Compliance in Pollution Standards
10. The East Asian banking sector—overweight?