using ( 55) we have:
Le = (1 - а)в N
(63)
0 (1 - α)β +(1 - β) N0.
Substituting ( 62) in ( 63) and solving the equation for w* we obtain:
w* = (1 - α)[(1
- α)β +(1 - β) AO- Ko
(1 - α)β No
(64)
that is:
* ∩ u(1 - α)β + (1 - β) KO iα {(ir∖
ωo = <1 - a)[—.— A, ∙ (65)
From ( 53) we obtain : st* = β(1 - α)wt* and defining the equilibrium unem-
ployment benefit per unit of efficient labor, σ*, as σ* = At we also have
σto = β(1 - α)ωto∙ (66)
Substituting ( 58) and ( 61) in ( 66) we obtain:
σ* = β(1-α)(1 - α)(2-α)[⅛-]α;
(1 + n)
(67)
and
σ*-R = β(1 - α)2-α (—C—)1-α . (68)
- (1 + n)
Finally, substituting ( 61) in ( 23) we obtain that yLo -R = (1 + g)(1 + n) - 1
and the rate of growth of employment is always equal to the rate of population
growth because the rate of unemployment is constant with time.
Proof of Proposition 6. 1 We define equation 31 as F (ωt, ωt-1 , ut) = 0 and
equation 32 as G(ωt, ωt-1, ut-1, ut) = 0 which implicitly define the system:
ωt = f1 (ωt-1, ut-1), ut = f2 (ωt-1 , ut-1). Linearizing this system around the
steady state and simplifying we obtain the fol lowing jacobian matrix:
J=
∂fl ∂f2
∂ωt-ι ∂ut-ι
∂f2 ∂fι
∂ωt-ι ∂ut-ι
Y+[(1-a)(1+g)-Y] U
y+ α [(1-αX1+5)-γ] U
1 + α (1-u)
ɪ γ
γ+ α [(1-α)(1+g)-γ] U
-[(1-α)(1+S)-Y] u(ι-u) ^
γ+α [(1-α)(1+g)-γ] U
.
_________γ_________
γ+α [(1-a)(1+g)-Y] и? -
(69)
The eigen values, λ, are obtained computing the equation det(λI - J) = 0. If
γ = (1 - α)(1 + g) then u = 1 and J =
, which means a unique eigen
value λ = 1 and, then, the system does not converge to the steady state. If
γ < (1 - α)(1 + g) then 0 < u < 1. In this case one can compute that the eigen
values will be real numbers if and only if
α1
(70)
γ< 4(Γ+Σ)[(1 - a)(1 + g) - γ]U∙
23
More intriguing information
1. Midwest prospects and the new economy2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Road pricing and (re)location decisions households
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS