Constrained School Choice

[26] Papai, S. (2000) “Strategyproof Assignment by Hierarchical Exchange,” Economet-
rica, 68, 1403-1433.

[27] Pathak, P.A. and T. Sonmez (2008) “Leveling the Playing Field: Sincere and Strate-
gic Players in the Boston Mechanism,” American Economic Review, 98, 1636-1652.

[28] Romero-Medina, A. (1998) “Implementation of Stable Solutions in a Restricted
Matching Market,” Review of Economic Design, 3, 137-147.

[29] Roth, A.E. (1982a) “Incentive Compatibility in a Market with Indivisible Goods,”
Economics Letters, 9, 127-132.

[30] Roth, A.E. (1982b) “The Economics of Matching: Stability and Efficiency,” Mathe-
matics of Operations Research, 92, 617-628.

[31] Roth, A.E. (1984) “Misrepresentation and Stability in the Marriage Problem,” Jour-
nal of Economic Theory, 34, 383-387.

[32] Roth, A.E. (2002) “The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation,
and Computation as Tools for Design Economics,” Econometrica, 70, 1341-1378.

[33] Roth, A.E. and A. Postlewaite (1977) “Weak versus Strong Domination in a Market
with Indivisible Goods,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 4, 131-137.

[34] Roth, A.E. and M.A.O. Sotomayor (1990) Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-
Theoretic Modeling and Analysis. Econometric Society Monograph Series. New York:
Cambridge University Press.

[35] Satterthwaite, M.A. and H. Sonnenschein (1981) “Strategy-Proof Allocation Mecha-
nisms at Differentiable Points,” Review of Economic Studies, 48, 587-597.

[36] Shapley, L.S. and H. Scarf (1974) “On Cores and Indivisibility,” Journal of Mathe-
matical Economics, 1, 23-37.

[37] Shinotsuka, T. and K. Takamiya (2003) “The Weak Core of Simple Games with
Ordinal Preferences: Implementation in Nash Equilibrium,” Games and Economic
Behavior, 44, 379-389.

[38] Sotomayor, M.A.O. (1998) “The Strategy Structure of the College Admissions Stable
Mechanisms,” Mimeo, Universidade de Sao Paulo.

48

<<   45   46   47   48   49   >>

More intriguing information