An alternative way to model merit good arguments



By definition of Fg (), Fg [x, y, ug (z, x, y)] = z, which means the above expression
can be written as

Fg [x, y, ug(z, x, y)] = F


x,y,u z+ + У* μ(χ)dχ,χ,y


') - μ μ(χ)dχ
J
J    gyg


(36)


From (14)

Fg [x, y, ug (z, x, y)] = Fg


Therefore


χ,y,u^z + У μ(x)dχ,χ,y^


ug (z,χ,y) = u(z +[ μ(χ)dχ,χ,y
    ygμ                .


Proof of lemma 1.


uh g

Expression I uh ) can be written as


vh              yh

-2hh - h +     μ(χ)dχ,xh

-1              J<j∙


xh,yh - yh).


(37)

(38)

(39)



looks similar but has the extra term μ(yh)).

For these preferences, it can be shown that the Marshallian demands for
commodity x is of the form

dbh(q) - χh

χh(q, mh) = χh + b(qd)qx- m. p [mh - mh(p)].               (40)

where b(q ) is minimal expenditure necessary to generate one unit of utility and
m
h(p) =f zh + qxχh + qyyh denotes survival income. Similar expressions hold for
the other two commodities.

Under the lemma’s assumptions, expression (39) reduces for every agent h to

-i (

-1


∂b(q)
∂ qz


χ + μ[


∂b(q)
d
qy


- y],


∂ b(q)
∂ qχ


x,


∂b(q)


∂qy


- y),


(41)


since the expression is homogenous of degree 0 in its arguments and the term
mq)-jm(p) thus drops out. Every agent will then have the same vector of (first best)

13



More intriguing information

1. Der Einfluß der Direktdemokratie auf die Sozialpolitik
2. Cultural Diversity and Human Rights: a propos of a minority educational reform
3. Unemployment in an Interdependent World
4. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin
5. The Distribution of Income of Self-employed, Entrepreneurs and Professions as Revealed from Micro Income Tax Statistics in Germany
6. Testing Hypotheses in an I(2) Model with Applications to the Persistent Long Swings in the Dmk/$ Rate
7. The name is absent
8. The Integration Order of Vector Autoregressive Processes
9. El Mercosur y la integración económica global
10. The name is absent