tax rates, tc , say. Since all substitution effects are proportional to supernumerary
income, (21) reduces to
Ph βh(mh - m(P))tc = t [βav + Cθv(βh, mh - m )]tc = t mav — m(p)) |
(42) (43) |
On the other hand, because the income effects are independent of income,
(23) can be written as βhr(tc) = r(t), where r(∙) denotes the net increase in gov-
ernment revenue from a marginal increase in the lump sum grant to a consumer.
Combining both results gives:
rr(⅛ tc =t (44)
If then r(t) > (<) r(tc) then tc À (≪) t. Because both income effects are
positive, this implies that r(tc) > (<) r(t), a contradiction. Therefore tc = t and
βh =1 (all h).
14
More intriguing information
1. Workforce or Workfare?2. Spectral density bandwith choice and prewightening in the estimation of heteroskadasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrices in panel data models
3. The name is absent
4. Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)
5. Reputations, Market Structure, and the Choice of Quality Assurance Systems in the Food Industry
6. Handling the measurement error problem by means of panel data: Moment methods applied on firm data
7. The name is absent
8. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
9. An Economic Analysis of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Implications for Overweight and Obesity among Higher- and Lower-Income Consumers
10. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11