tax rates, tc , say. Since all substitution effects are proportional to supernumerary
income, (21) reduces to
Ph βh(mh - m(P))tc = t [βav + Cθv(βh, mh - m )]tc = t mav — m(p)) |
(42) (43) |
On the other hand, because the income effects are independent of income,
(23) can be written as βhr(tc) = r(t), where r(∙) denotes the net increase in gov-
ernment revenue from a marginal increase in the lump sum grant to a consumer.
Combining both results gives:
rr(⅛ tc =t (44)
If then r(t) > (<) r(tc) then tc À (≪) t. Because both income effects are
positive, this implies that r(tc) > (<) r(t), a contradiction. Therefore tc = t and
βh =1 (all h).
14
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Place of Work and Place of Residence: Informal Hiring Networks and Labor Market Outcomes
3. Dual Inflation Under the Currency Board: The Challenges of Bulgarian EU Accession
4. The name is absent
5. Critical Race Theory and Education: Racism and antiracism in educational theory and praxis David Gillborn*
6. Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA
7. Implementation of the Ordinal Shapley Value for a three-agent economy
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt