An alternative way to model merit good arguments



tax rates, tc , say. Since all substitution effects are proportional to supernumerary
income, (21) reduces to

Ph βh(mh - m(P))tc = t
Phmh - m(p))        ,

[βav + Cθv(βh, mh - m     )]tc = t

mav m(p))

(42)

(43)

On the other hand, because the income effects are independent of income,
(23) can be written as
βhr(tc) = r(t), where r() denotes the net increase in gov-
ernment revenue from a marginal increase in the lump sum grant to a consumer.
Combining both results gives:

rr(⅛ tc =t                               (44)

If then r(t) (<) r(tc) then tc À () t.  Because both income effects are

positive, this implies that r(tc) (<) r(t), a contradiction. Therefore tc = t and
βh =1 (all h).

14



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. Name Strategy: Its Existence and Implications
4. The name is absent
5. PACKAGING: A KEY ELEMENT IN ADDED VALUE
6. The name is absent
7. Return Predictability and Stock Market Crashes in a Simple Rational Expectations Model
8. Confusion and Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Public Goods Games
9. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles
10. The name is absent