An alternative way to model merit good arguments



commodities (although with 3 or more commodities, the income effects are more
involved
).

To fix ideas, suppose that the government considers y as a merit good, μ(χ) >
0, χ 0, and that both x and y are normal goods. Then both non-numéraire
commodities should be subsidised. First, the merit good should be subsidised
with a rate at which the government’s MWP exceeds that of the consumer (μ).
But in addition,
both non-numéraire goods should be subsidised for the difference
in willingness to pay for all inframarginal units. The intuition is as follows.
The government is convinced that the consumer is better off than she herself
believes she is (because she ignores the merit properties of the third good). To
the extent that the non-
numéraire commodities are normal goods, it considers
both commodities as underconsumed (relative to the
numéraire) and wants to
stimulate their consumption by subsidisation.

5 Second-best rules

Suppose now that there are many consumers, indexed by h, with not necessarily
the same preferences or income level, and that the government cannot differentiate
commodity taxes across consumers. Let social preferences be given by

W = X λ'hwgh (zh*, xh, ∙h = X h (~+ + χh μ(χ)dχ, xh, tA .    (19)

To focus on the efficiency arguments, I assume that differentiated lump sum taxes
are available. The government’s problem is then8

ι≡ X λ     (z h(qχ, qy, mh - T h),xh(qx, qy, mh - T h),yh(qx, qy, mh T h

tx,ty,{T } h

(20)

s.t. X tχXh(qχ,qy ,mh Th) + X ty yh(qχ,qy ,mh Th) + X Th R (γ )

Defining βh d=f λ-u-


and proceeding in the same way as in the first best case,


we get:


xh

X β hμ s
h ' ∂qχ


C μ tx = Æh ∂bh k C μ tx X

db√ V th 7    p dyh P dbh) ty ty J

∂qy7  y  y 7     h∂qh ∂qχ  2^h ∂qy 7  V  ^7


(21)


def h         gh                def  h         gh

where a denotes a compensated price effect and th = -hh--2h and th = -⅛--3h

x    u1   u1g        y    u1   ug1

8 I agree with Capéau and Ooghe (2003) that the reaction functions entering the social
welfare function should be those of the real agents, and not, as Besley (1988) proceeded, those
of phantom agents that are endowed with the ’right’ preferences.



More intriguing information

1. The Dynamic Cost of the Draft
2. On the job rotation problem
3. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?
4. The Distribution of Income of Self-employed, Entrepreneurs and Professions as Revealed from Micro Income Tax Statistics in Germany
5. A Duality Approach to Testing the Economic Behaviour of Dairy-Marketing Co-operatives: The Case of Ireland
6. Urban Green Space Policies: Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities
7. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
8. The name is absent
9. An Attempt to 2
10. The name is absent
11. The Social Context as a Determinant of Teacher Motivational Strategies in Physical Education
12. Wettbewerbs- und Industriepolitik - EU-Integration als Dritter Weg?
13. Name Strategy: Its Existence and Implications
14. The name is absent
15. THE INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK FOR U.S. TOBACCO
16. A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities
17. The Shepherd Sinfonia
18. QUEST II. A Multi-Country Business Cycle and Growth Model
19. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations
20. The role of statin drugs in combating cardiovascular diseases