An alternative way to model merit good arguments



commodities (although with 3 or more commodities, the income effects are more
involved
).

To fix ideas, suppose that the government considers y as a merit good, μ(χ) >
0, χ 0, and that both x and y are normal goods. Then both non-numéraire
commodities should be subsidised. First, the merit good should be subsidised
with a rate at which the government’s MWP exceeds that of the consumer (μ).
But in addition,
both non-numéraire goods should be subsidised for the difference
in willingness to pay for all inframarginal units. The intuition is as follows.
The government is convinced that the consumer is better off than she herself
believes she is (because she ignores the merit properties of the third good). To
the extent that the non-
numéraire commodities are normal goods, it considers
both commodities as underconsumed (relative to the
numéraire) and wants to
stimulate their consumption by subsidisation.

5 Second-best rules

Suppose now that there are many consumers, indexed by h, with not necessarily
the same preferences or income level, and that the government cannot differentiate
commodity taxes across consumers. Let social preferences be given by

W = X λ'hwgh (zh*, xh, ∙h = X h (~+ + χh μ(χ)dχ, xh, tA .    (19)

To focus on the efficiency arguments, I assume that differentiated lump sum taxes
are available. The government’s problem is then8

ι≡ X λ     (z h(qχ, qy, mh - T h),xh(qx, qy, mh - T h),yh(qx, qy, mh T h

tx,ty,{T } h

(20)

s.t. X tχXh(qχ,qy ,mh Th) + X ty yh(qχ,qy ,mh Th) + X Th R (γ )

Defining βh d=f λ-u-


and proceeding in the same way as in the first best case,


we get:


xh

X β hμ s
h ' ∂qχ


C μ tx = Æh ∂bh k C μ tx X

db√ V th 7    p dyh P dbh) ty ty J

∂qy7  y  y 7     h∂qh ∂qχ  2^h ∂qy 7  V  ^7


(21)


def h         gh                def  h         gh

where a denotes a compensated price effect and th = -hh--2h and th = -⅛--3h

x    u1   u1g        y    u1   ug1

8 I agree with Capéau and Ooghe (2003) that the reaction functions entering the social
welfare function should be those of the real agents, and not, as Besley (1988) proceeded, those
of phantom agents that are endowed with the ’right’ preferences.



More intriguing information

1. THE CO-EVOLUTION OF MATTER AND CONSCIOUSNESS1
2. Self-Help Groups and Income Generation in the Informal Settlements of Nairobi
3. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
4. The name is absent
5. Les freins culturels à l'adoption des IFRS en Europe : une analyse du cas français
6. The storage and use of newborn babies’ blood spot cards: a public consultation
7. Life is an Adventure! An agent-based reconciliation of narrative and scientific worldviews
8. Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent