Fiscal Insurance and Debt Management in OECD Economies



a shock MVj d°ttj (b) a term reflecting how the financing costs of future deficits alter because of
t+ι

the deficit shock ( d21i-lVl ωM ) and (c) a term reflecting the impact of the shock on future fiscal
+ιt      ^r*y

.   .        , , ∂ω'' - _            _     _                         .....     .     ...

deficits Φιt+j(L) д. In the case where the return on government debt is independent of shocks to
the economy (as in the case where the government issues only one period risk free debt and shocks
are i.i.d, as in Aiyagari et al (2001))6, then (3) reduces to

^MV)+j _ ʌ ,j+1-fc ^ωt+k
≤ι = ⅛ ψu+j ≤1

(4)


where ф^+ is the j + 1 Hh coefficient in the lag polynomial ≠ιt+j (L). In other words debt would
only rise by the accumulated impact of the shock on future deficits with no offsetting effects through
changes in bond prices. Comparing (3) and (4) we have a natural measure of fiscal insurance, namely

9MVt*+j
t*


φj =


(5)


v j++1--fe^ωA⅛
ь φu+j ∂εf
k=1            τ

This statistic7 is the ratio between the estimated change in the market value of debt in response
to a deficit shock (as estimated from a VAR) and the increase in debt that would have occurred from
cumulating the total effect on current and future deficits in response to the current deficit shock. If
Φ
j = 1 then debt levels rise by exactly the amount of the primary fiscal deficits accumulated over
time in which case debt management offers no fiscal insurance. In the case where Φ
j = 0 then debt
shows no response to increases in the deficit because bond prices fall to offset the higher deficits and
debt is stabilized. Note that in the case of complete markets and persistent shocks we know that
debt levels
fall on impact so that Φθ < 0 but then increases thereafter. A measure of Φj between 0
and 1 implies that the government achieves some degree of fiscal insurance - debt levels increase by
less than the accumulated impact on the fiscal deficit as changes in interest rates offset the impact
of shocks. Notice that it is also possible for Φ
j > 1. In this case the debt level rises by more than
the accumulated impact of fiscal deficits as interest rates move
adversely in response to the shock.

6The market value of debt will vary with fiscal shocks both because the government issues explicitly state contingent
debt or fixed coupon bonds whose market price varies endogenously with the economy.

7Because the coefficients in the lag polynomial φlt+j (T) depend on the growth adjusted interest rate and are time
varying this measure of fiscal insurance is also time varying. To avoid this complication we estimate (5) evaluating
Rt+jYt/Yt+j at its sample averages and denote this measure Φ*.

10



More intriguing information

1. Palkkaneuvottelut ja työmarkkinat Pohjoismaissa ja Euroopassa
2. THE INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK FOR U.S. TOBACCO
3. The name is absent
4. Legal Minimum Wages and the Wages of Formal and Informal Sector Workers in Costa Rica
5. Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. THE WAEA -- WHICH NICHE IN THE PROFESSION?
9. ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENT REGRESSION MODELS FOR APPLIED AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH
10. Behaviour-based Knowledge Systems: An Epigenetic Path from Behaviour to Knowledge
11. The name is absent
12. CHANGING PRICES, CHANGING CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION
13. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
14. Estimating the Impact of Medication on Diabetics' Diet and Lifestyle Choices
15. Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation
16. Consumer Networks and Firm Reputation: A First Experimental Investigation
17. The name is absent
18. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent