Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources

Moir, Robert (1999): “Spies and Swords: behavior in environments with costly monitoring and sanctioning,”
manuscript, Dept. of Economics, University of New Brunswick, Canada.

Nowak, Martin A. and Sigmund Karl (1998): “Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity by Image Scoring,” Nature,
393, 573-576.

Ostrom, Elinor, Roy Gardner, and James Walker (1994): Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources, Ann
Arbor, University of Michigan.

Palfrey, T.R., and Prisbey, J.E., 1997. Anomalous Behavior in Public Goods Experiments: How Much and
Why?. American Economic Review 87, 5, 829-846.

Riechmann, Thomas (1999): "Learning and Behavioral Stability: An economic interpretation of genetic
algorithms,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9, 225-242.

Rocco, Elena and Massimo Warglien (1996): “Computer mediated communication and the emergence of
‘electronic opportunism,’ ” Working paper 1996-01, University of Trento.

Rubinstein, Ariel (1998): Modeling bounded rationality, Cambridge, MIT Press.

Saijo, T., and Nakamura, H., 1995. The ‘Spite’ Dilemma in Voluntary Contribution Mechanism Experiments.

Journal of Conflict Resolution 39, 3, 535-560.

Vriend, Nicolaas J. (2000): An Illustration of the Essential Difference between Individual and Social Learning,
and its Consequences for Computational Analysis, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 24, 1,1-19.

Walker, James M., Roy Gardner, and Elinor Ostrom (1990): “Rent Dissipation in a Limited-Access Common-
Pool Resource: Experimental Evidence,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 19, 203-
211.

22

<<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   >>

More intriguing information