Human |
Nash |
Artificial agents, |
agents |
pm=0.02, pc=0.00, T=64__________________________ | |
H |
Equilibriu |
A [0, 50] B [0, 20] C [0, 16] |
___________________________________________________(1) |
m (2) |
(3) (4) (5)_______________________________ |
GROUP RESULTS |
X - Resource use |
131.32 |
128.00 |
130.40 |
126.21 |
123.90 |
σ(X) -Standard deviation of use over time |
12.95 |
0.00 |
15.03 |
5.59 |
4.24 |
Efficiency |
28.4% |
39.5% |
29.75% |
42.69% |
47.68% |
Periods with negative earnings |
15.5% |
0.00% |
16.00% |
0.03% |
0.00% |
INDIVIDUAL RESULTS | |||||
MAX2 -Agent with maximum use (2) |
37.92 |
16.00 |
27.72 |
17.65 |
15.94 |
MIN2 - Agent with minimum use (3) |
9.57 |
16.00 |
8.75 |
10.65 |
14.81 |
D2 - Individual difference, (2)-(3) |
28.35 |
0.00 |
18.97 |
7.00 |
1.03 |
Notes: K=6, N=8, L=8, pm=0.02; GA v.5.0. See notes to Table 1.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics
3. The ultimate determinants of central bank independence
4. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"
5. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture
6. The name is absent
7. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
8. Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?
9. The Evolution
10. A Note on Costly Sequential Search and Oligopoly Pricing (new title: Truly Costly Sequential Search and Oligopolistic Pricing,)