Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources



Human

Nash

Artificial agents,

agents

pm=0.02, pc=0.00, T=64__________________________

H

Equilibriu

A [0, 50] B [0, 20] C [0, 16]

___________________________________________________(1)

m (2)

(3)          (4)          (5)_______________________________

GROUP RESULTS

X - Resource use

131.32

128.00

130.40

126.21

123.90

σ(X) -Standard deviation of use over time

12.95

0.00

15.03

5.59

4.24

Efficiency

28.4%

39.5%

29.75%

42.69%

47.68%

Periods with negative earnings

15.5%

0.00%

16.00%

0.03%

0.00%

INDIVIDUAL RESULTS

MAX2 -Agent with maximum use (2)

37.92

16.00

27.72

17.65

15.94

MIN2 - Agent with minimum use (3)

9.57

16.00

8.75

10.65

14.81

D2 - Individual difference, (2)-(3)

28.35

0.00

18.97

7.00

1.03

Notes: K=6, N=8, L=8, pm=0.02; GA v.5.0. See notes to Table 1.



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics
3. The ultimate determinants of central bank independence
4. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"
5. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture
6. The name is absent
7. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
8. Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?
9. The Evolution
10. A Note on Costly Sequential Search and Oligopoly Pricing (new title: Truly Costly Sequential Search and Oligopolistic Pricing,)