Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources



Human

Nash

Artificial agents,

agents

pm=0.02, pc=0.00, T=64__________________________

H

Equilibriu

A [0, 50] B [0, 20] C [0, 16]

___________________________________________________(1)

m (2)

(3)          (4)          (5)_______________________________

GROUP RESULTS

X - Resource use

131.32

128.00

130.40

126.21

123.90

σ(X) -Standard deviation of use over time

12.95

0.00

15.03

5.59

4.24

Efficiency

28.4%

39.5%

29.75%

42.69%

47.68%

Periods with negative earnings

15.5%

0.00%

16.00%

0.03%

0.00%

INDIVIDUAL RESULTS

MAX2 -Agent with maximum use (2)

37.92

16.00

27.72

17.65

15.94

MIN2 - Agent with minimum use (3)

9.57

16.00

8.75

10.65

14.81

D2 - Individual difference, (2)-(3)

28.35

0.00

18.97

7.00

1.03

Notes: K=6, N=8, L=8, pm=0.02; GA v.5.0. See notes to Table 1.



More intriguing information

1. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Protocol for Past BP: a randomised controlled trial of different blood pressure targets for people with a history of stroke of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in primary care
5. Literary criticism as such can perhaps be called the art of rereading.
6. The Global Dimension to Fiscal Sustainability
7. he Effect of Phosphorylation on the Electron Capture Dissociation of Peptide Ions
8. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note
9. An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.
10. The name is absent