Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources



Table 1 : Simulations of Resource Use Without Sanctions -Dynamic Over Time

Human    Nash

Artificial agents,
_______
pm=0.02, pc=0.00________

Artificial agents,
______
T=64_______

agents

H     Equilibriu ’

T=32

(3)

T=64    T=400

pm=0.02 pm=0.01

(1)       m (2)

(4)          (5)

pc=0.40   pc=0.00

(6)          (7)

GROUP RESULTS

X - Resource use

0.95 confidence interval on X

131.32     128.00

[127.25,           -

135.39]

131.02
[130.96,
131.08]

130.40    130.02

[130.35,    [129.98,

130.45]    130.06]

130.52       129.82

σ(X) -Standard deviation of use over time

12.95       0.00

17.50

15.03      14.04

14.53       9.51

Efficiency

28.4%    39.5%

26.85%

29.75%   31.16%

29.75%   33.55%

Periods with negative earnings

15.5%    0.00%

19.59%

16.00%   14.97%

16.12%    8.22%

INDIVIDUAL RESULTS

MAX2 -Agent with maximum use (2)

37.92      16.00

28.71

27.72     27.01

25.04     25.89

MIN2 - Agent with minimum use (3)

9.57      16.00

5.93

8.75      11.35

9.31        9.81

D2 - Individual difference, (2)-(3)

SD2 -Individual use standard deviation
0.95 confidence interval of SD2

Test of H0 {XH=XGA}

Test of H0 {SD2H=SD2GA}

28.35       0.00

9.05       0.00

[5.13,             -

33.42]

22.78      18.97      15.66

5.76       4.79       4.09

[5.04, 6.65] [4.19, 5.53] [3.58, 4.72]

Cannot Cannot Cannot
reject H
0 reject H0 reject H0

Cannot   p-value= H0 rejected

reject H0     0.05________________

15.73      16.08

Notes to Table 1: T=total periods of simulation; 32 periods considered in

the statistics, T-32,...,T. If T=32 all

the periods of the simulation are included in the

statistics. The basic action is the use level of the resource, xitk, by agent i

Q

=1,..,8 at period t=1,..,T for run k=1
T

,..,100 (random seeds 0.005 through 0.995). The

aggregate resource use Xtk= xitk and its average
i=1

for each run is Xk =

1 Xtk
τt=T-τ+1

. The significance tests are carried out, using Xk as a single observation,

under the null hypothesis H0 that the random variables Zi are iid and normally distributed. Parameters of the GA: K=6, N=8, L=8, pm=0.02; GA v.5.0.

Table 3: Simulations of Resource Use - Impact of Strategy Space



More intriguing information

1. Rural-Urban Economic Disparities among China’s Elderly
2. IMPACTS OF EPA DAIRY WASTE REGULATIONS ON FARM PROFITABILITY
3. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
4. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
5. The Impact of Minimum Wages on Wage Inequality and Employment in the Formal and Informal Sector in Costa Rica
6. The name is absent
7. Prizes and Patents: Using Market Signals to Provide Incentives for Innovations
8. The name is absent
9. The Role of Trait Emotional Intelligence (El) in the Workplace.
10. Volunteering and the Strategic Value of Ignorance
11. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
12. The name is absent
13. The name is absent
14. DIVERSITY OF RURAL PLACES - TEXAS
15. The name is absent
16. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
17. Quality Enhancement for E-Learning Courses: The Role of Student Feedback
18. Discourse Patterns in First Language Use at Hcme and Second Language Learning at School: an Ethnographic Approach
19. Skill and work experience in the European knowledge economy
20. Healthy state, worried workers: North Carolina in the world economy