Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources



Figure 2: Genetic algorithms and randomness

Notes: Nash equilibrium: prediction with selfish, perfectly rational agents; Human subjects: average of 4
experimental sessions;
Genetic algorithm agents: selfish, boundedly rational agents (T=64,τ=32, average over 100
simulated runs, v.5.0);
Zero-intelligence agents: random draws from a uniform distribution (average over 100
simulated runs v.5.6);
xi ~U[0,θ] with xi iid, θ=50; Noisy Nash agents: are ZI with probability p and are best
responders to other Noisy Nash agents with probability (1-p).



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Personal Income Tax Elasticity in Turkey: 1975-2005
3. The Role of Trait Emotional Intelligence (El) in the Workplace.
4. Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal
5. Giant intra-abdominal hydatid cysts with multivisceral locations
6. Estimation of marginal abatement costs for undesirable outputs in India's power generation sector: An output distance function approach.
7. Perfect Regular Equilibrium
8. The name is absent
9. The geography of collaborative knowledge production: entropy techniques and results for the European Union
10. A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data