and stability of steady states for all types of dictatorship and examine their implications on
economic development. The dynamic system of dictatorship without insurrection threat
is as follows:
kt +1 = 1 + β(1 - τt)(1 - α)Akα
(20)
(21)
(22)
qt+1 = 1
1 /"' ( σ-1 )(1 -a )
α σ τtkt
Tt +1 α ( σ-1)
/ ∖ 1 , ι 1 + α ( σ— 1) /э , . . σ
(1 + ρ )σ (1 - τt ) σ 1+β(1 - α ) A
Equation (20) equalizes savings and investment. Equation (21) indicates that the dynam-
ics of the predation rate, q, is constant and equal to one. Finally, equation (22) gives the
expected income tax rate as a function of the current income tax rate and the current
capital stock. It is computed by eliminating the Lagrange multiplier λ from (16)-(18),
and plugging (20) in (18).
3.1 Steady state
Proposition 1 Any form of dictatorship characterized by the dynamic system (20)-(22)
admits a unique interior steady state.
Proof:
• There exists a unique interior steady state characterized by:
20
More intriguing information
1. Regulation of the Electricity Industry in Bolivia: Its Impact on Access to the Poor, Prices and Quality2. Corporate Taxation and Multinational Activity
3. Stable Distributions
4. Can a Robot Hear Music? Can a Robot Dance? Can a Robot Tell What it Knows or Intends to Do? Can it Feel Pride or Shame in Company?
5. ROBUST CLASSIFICATION WITH CONTEXT-SENSITIVE FEATURES
6. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note
7. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES
8. Midwest prospects and the new economy
9. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
10. IMPROVING THE UNIVERSITY'S PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION