and stability of steady states for all types of dictatorship and examine their implications on
economic development. The dynamic system of dictatorship without insurrection threat
is as follows:
kt +1 = 1 + β(1 - τt)(1 - α)Akα
(20)
(21)
(22)
qt+1 = 1
1 /"' ( σ-1 )(1 -a )
α σ τtkt
Tt +1 α ( σ-1)
/ ∖ 1 , ι 1 + α ( σ— 1) /э , . . σ
(1 + ρ )σ (1 - τt ) σ 1+β(1 - α ) A
Equation (20) equalizes savings and investment. Equation (21) indicates that the dynam-
ics of the predation rate, q, is constant and equal to one. Finally, equation (22) gives the
expected income tax rate as a function of the current income tax rate and the current
capital stock. It is computed by eliminating the Lagrange multiplier λ from (16)-(18),
and plugging (20) in (18).
3.1 Steady state
Proposition 1 Any form of dictatorship characterized by the dynamic system (20)-(22)
admits a unique interior steady state.
Proof:
• There exists a unique interior steady state characterized by:
20
More intriguing information
1. Gerontocracy in Motion? – European Cross-Country Evidence on the Labor Market Consequences of Population Ageing2. The name is absent
3. SME'S SUPPORT AND REGIONAL POLICY IN EU - THE NORTE-LITORAL PORTUGUESE EXPERIENCE
4. Who’s afraid of critical race theory in education? a reply to Mike Cole’s ‘The color-line and the class struggle’
5. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. LAND-USE EVALUATION OF KOCAELI UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS AREA
9. Portuguese Women in Science and Technology (S&T): Some Gender Features Behind MSc. and PhD. Achievement
10. Income Taxation when Markets are Incomplete