Elicited bid functions in (a)symmetric first-price auctions



Table 2 - Piecewise linear bid functions predicted by the risk neutral Nash equilibrium (RNNE)

Treatment

* *

( x1, У*)

Strong

slope 2

Weak

**

( x2, У2)

slope 1

* *

( x1, У1)

**

( x2, У 2)

slope 1

slope 2

LOW

(41, 0)

(100, 30)

0

.51

(13, 0)

(100, 31)

0

.36

MIX

(40, 0)

(100, 27)

0

.45

(16, 0)

(75, 27)

0

.46

SYM

(x, 2x)

(100, 50)

.50

.50

(x, 2x)

(100, 50)

.50

.50

Table 3 - Piecewise linear bid functions predicted by the risk averse Nash equilibrium (RANE) with a constant
relative risk aversion parameter of
r = .5

Treatment

* *

( x1, У1)

Strong

slope 2

Weak

**

( x2, У2)

slope 1

* *

( x1, У1)

**

( x2, У 2)

slope 1

slope 2

LOW

(29, 0)

(100, 48)

0

.68

(5, 0)

(100, 52)

0

.55

MIX

(26, 0)

(100, 46)

0

.62

(8, 0)

(75, 45)

0

.67

SYM

(2x, 3x)

(100, 67)

.67

.67

(2x, 3x)

(100, 67)

.67

.67

2.2. Procedures

The experiment was conducted at the Laboratory for Experimental Economics of the
University of Bonn. Most subjects were students in law or economics and were recruited by
public advertisement on campus. They were required not to have participated in an auction
experiment before. We considered the three treatments described above: one for low-balling
(LOW), one for a mixture of low-balling and the
“Getty effect” (MIX) and one for the
symmetric framework (SYM). We conducted a total of 8 experimental sessions: 6 with the
asymmetric treatments and 2 with the symmetric treatment. In each session, the cohort of 18
subjects was divided into 3 groups of 6 subjects. These groups were independent in the sense
that subjects interacted only with the other members of their group. Each session lasted for
about 3 hours. Average earnings in the experiment were DM 60 (which at that the time of the
experiment were approximately equal to US$28).

10



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The resources and strategies that 10-11 year old boys use to construct masculinities in the school setting
3. The name is absent
4. THE RISE OF RURAL-TO-RURAL LABOR MARKETS IN CHINA
5. The Trade Effects of MERCOSUR and The Andean Community on U.S. Cotton Exports to CBI countries
6. The name is absent
7. Globalization, Divergence and Stagnation
8. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption
9. Global Excess Liquidity and House Prices - A VAR Analysis for OECD Countries
10. SME'S SUPPORT AND REGIONAL POLICY IN EU - THE NORTE-LITORAL PORTUGUESE EXPERIENCE
11. Modellgestützte Politikberatung im Naturschutz: Zur „optimalen“ Flächennutzung in der Agrarlandschaft des Biosphärenreservates „Mittlere Elbe“
12. On s-additive robust representation of convex risk measures for unbounded financial positions in the presence of uncertainty about the market model
13. The name is absent
14. QUEST II. A Multi-Country Business Cycle and Growth Model
15. RETAIL SALES: DO THEY MEAN REDUCED EXPENDITURES? GERMAN GROCERY EVIDENCE
16. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
17. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
18. Graphical Data Representation in Bankruptcy Analysis
19. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
20. The name is absent