When the resale market is available, the two types of household face the CPI
above. Compared to Eq. (6), the CPI is reduced when resale is possible, as α<1.
When the proportion α =1, and the two models become the same.
Proposition 5 Assuming that x,lm ≤ x2m and xs — αx ≥ 0, with resale, transitional
policy increases the CPI, i.e., dp > 0 > dp.
We conclude that with or without the possibility of resale, transitional policy
conditionally deflates the market price while inflating the CPI of DTP goods.
3.2 Winners and Losers
With the two types of household and resale, the indirect utility functions are
v1 = v[p, y1 + (p — p)x];
v2 = v(p,y2}.
Using these functions, we obtain our last proposition.
Proposition 6 When resale is possible, transitional policy reduces the welfare of a
type-1 household, i.e., dp < 0 < dv- ; but it raises the welfare of a type-2 household,
i.e.,dv2 > 0 > dv2.
d dp dx
Irrespective of whether resale is possible, transitional policy reduces the im-
plicit subsidy component of the type-1 household’s full income and therefore re-
23
More intriguing information
1. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture2. The name is absent
3. Reversal of Fortune: Macroeconomic Policy, International Finance, and Banking in Japan
4. The Triangular Relationship between the Commission, NRAs and National Courts Revisited
5. Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region
6. LAND-USE EVALUATION OF KOCAELI UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS AREA
7. The Role of area-yield crop insurance program face to the Mid-term Review of Common Agricultural Policy
8. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
9. Co-ordinating European sectoral policies against the background of European Spatial Development
10. THE CO-EVOLUTION OF MATTER AND CONSCIOUSNESS1