Differentiating (12) and combining it with the Slutsky equation (3) for each type
of household yields
dp = αxχm :
(13)
(14)
dp ∆
dp -α(p — p)x1m
dx ∆
where
∆ = αS +(1— α)S — xm(xs — αx)) — (1 — α)x (xm — xm) — xsp. (15)
If x1 ≤ x2 and xs — αx) ≥ 0, then, given that S1 < 0 and S2 < 0, we have ∆ < 0.
mm
Since both types of household face the same market price p, the condition
x1m ≤ x2m holds for many common specifications of preferences. Thus, homothetic
and quasi-homothetic preferences with linear Engel curves have x1m = x2m. Fur-
thermore, much of DTP has been of necessities - for example, many foods and
housing. To the households employed in the non-state sector, without the direct
allocation from the plan-track, those goods may be considered more as luxuries
compared to the households with government subsidy, who pay less for those goods
in money terms. Therefore, we view x1m <x2m as a reasonable assumption, reflect-
ing a concave Engel curve. αx) is the total ration allocated by the central planning
system, which is part of the total supply of X . This gives our next proposition.
21
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Large Scale Studies in den deutschen Sozialwissenschaften:Stand und Perspektiven. Bericht über einen Workshop der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft
4. The name is absent
5. The Advantage of Cooperatives under Asymmetric Cost Information
6. The name is absent
7. Gerontocracy in Motion? – European Cross-Country Evidence on the Labor Market Consequences of Population Ageing
8. The name is absent
9. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between the Level of Infrastructure and Capital Inflows
10. The name is absent