Differentiating (12) and combining it with the Slutsky equation (3) for each type
of household yields
dp = αxχm :
(13)
(14)
dp ∆
dp -α(p — p)x1m
dx ∆
where
∆ = αS +(1— α)S — xm(xs — αx)) — (1 — α)x (xm — xm) — xsp. (15)
If x1 ≤ x2 and xs — αx) ≥ 0, then, given that S1 < 0 and S2 < 0, we have ∆ < 0.
mm
Since both types of household face the same market price p, the condition
x1m ≤ x2m holds for many common specifications of preferences. Thus, homothetic
and quasi-homothetic preferences with linear Engel curves have x1m = x2m. Fur-
thermore, much of DTP has been of necessities - for example, many foods and
housing. To the households employed in the non-state sector, without the direct
allocation from the plan-track, those goods may be considered more as luxuries
compared to the households with government subsidy, who pay less for those goods
in money terms. Therefore, we view x1m <x2m as a reasonable assumption, reflect-
ing a concave Engel curve. αx) is the total ration allocated by the central planning
system, which is part of the total supply of X . This gives our next proposition.
21
More intriguing information
1. Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights2. Human Rights Violations by the Executive: Complicity of the Judiciary in Cameroon?
3. Literary criticism as such can perhaps be called the art of rereading.
4. The name is absent
5. Ongoing Emergence: A Core Concept in Epigenetic Robotics
6. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
7. Commitment devices, opportunity windows, and institution building in Central Asia
8. Surveying the welfare state: challenges, policy development and causes of resilience
9. The name is absent
10. Modeling industrial location decisions in U.S. counties