The solutions to (9) and (10) yield the Marshallian demand functions
x1 = x[p,y1 + (p — p)x]
x'2 = x(p,y2).
Total demand for X is
x = αx1 +(1— α)x2.
Corresponding to (4), we have
dx1
dp
dx2
dp
x1 + x1mx = S1
pm
2
p.
(x1- χ)x1n;
(11)
Although dx2/dp < 0, dx1/dp may take either sign. Without the possibility of
resale, as discussed above, the household can only gain the implicit income when
it consumes more than its government subsidy. With resale, the type-1 household
gains an implicit income, even though it consumes less than the government sub-
sidy x. Eq. (11) shows that when the consumption x1 of DTP goods for a type-1
household is smaller than the plan-track quantity x, dx1∕dp is only negative if the
compensated demand change is numerically greater than the income effect, and
vice versa. However, when the consumption of DTP goods is greater than the
plan-track quantity for a type-1 household, dx1/dp is always negative. In Figure 4
19
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
4. Better policy analysis with better data. Constructing a Social Accounting Matrix from the European System of National Accounts.
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Income Mobility of Owners of Small Businesses when Boundaries between Occupations are Vague
8. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
9. Tax systems and tax reforms in Europe: Rationale and open issue for more radical reforms
10. Equity Markets and Economic Development: What Do We Know