Hence, substituting for dp from (13), we have
dv
dp
-vmx
S - xp
S — (x — x)xm — xp
< 0.
Similarly, assuming p > p and vm > 0, it is found that
dv
dx
vm
dp
, (x
dx
— x) + (p — p)
= vm(p — p)
S — xp
S — (x — x)xm — xp
> 0.
Proposition 5
Differentiating (17) w.r.t. p yields
dP x + χ p
dp x1 x1
p + (1
x) dp
x17 j dpi
(25)
dP
dx)
a
x1
— —
(p — p) + [α-p—p ⅛ + (1
x1 p p
x d j dp
x1 dx)
(26)
Substituting for dp from (13) and using x = xs > x1, we obtain
dP αXx £aS1 + (1 — α)S2 — (1 — α)x2xm — xp — ax((xs — x1)]
dpi α[S1 — x1m(x1 — x)] + (1 — α)(S2 — x2x‰) — xp
Similarly, substituting for dp from (14), we have
29
More intriguing information
1. Subduing High Inflation in Romania. How to Better Monetary and Exchange Rate Mechanisms?2. Discourse Patterns in First Language Use at Hcme and Second Language Learning at School: an Ethnographic Approach
3. The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence From a Travel Cost Method Study
4. Popular Conceptions of Nationhood in Old and New European
5. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
6. Investment and Interest Rate Policy in the Open Economy
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Work Rich, Time Poor? Time-Use of Women and Men in Ireland
10. The name is absent