Appendix 1: Proofs
Proposition 1
From (7), (xp + xmx)dp — xmxdp + xm(p — p)dx = xpdp. Hence, using (3) to
eliminate xp , we have
dp
dpx
xm x
(18)
(19)
S — (x — xx)xm — xsp
dp _ -(p — p)xm
dxx S — (x — xx)xm — xsp
Proposition 2
Differentiating (6) w.r.t. px , we then obtain 15
dP |
=dp+ |
1 |
—+— |
xx dp p')CX)2 xp dp. |
(20) | |
By assumption, |
∈p |
p dx = pττ< 0, |
(21) | |||
6P |
p dxs = ——> 0. |
(22) |
15We use brackets with superscript 2, (x)2 to define x square function. The superscript 2
without brackets represents variables for the type-2 household.
27
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.
3. The Effects of Reforming the Chinese Dual-Track Price System
4. A Critical Examination of the Beliefs about Learning a Foreign Language at Primary School
5. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 2003
6. The name is absent
7. Cardiac Arrhythmia and Geomagnetic Activity
8. The name is absent
9. Insurance within the firm
10. The Context of Sense and Sensibility