Appendix 1: Proofs
Proposition 1
From (7), (xp + xmx)dp — xmxdp + xm(p — p)dx = xpdp. Hence, using (3) to
eliminate xp , we have
dp
dpx
xm x
(18)
(19)
S — (x — xx)xm — xsp
dp _ -(p — p)xm
dxx S — (x — xx)xm — xsp
Proposition 2
Differentiating (6) w.r.t. px , we then obtain 15
dP |
=dp+ |
1 |
—+— |
xx dp p')CX)2 xp dp. |
(20) | |
By assumption, |
∈p |
p dx = pττ< 0, |
(21) | |||
6P |
p dxs = ——> 0. |
(22) |
15We use brackets with superscript 2, (x)2 to define x square function. The superscript 2
without brackets represents variables for the type-2 household.
27
More intriguing information
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES2. The name is absent
3. Sex-gender-sexuality: how sex, gender, and sexuality constellations are constituted in secondary schools
4. Studies on association of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and its effect on improvement of sorghum bicolor (L.)
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Estimating the Impact of Medication on Diabetics' Diet and Lifestyle Choices
8. Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network To Detect Hyperthermic Seizures In Rats
9. The name is absent
10. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin