Appendix 1: Proofs
Proposition 1
From (7), (xp + xmx)dp — xmxdp + xm(p — p)dx = xpdp. Hence, using (3) to
eliminate xp , we have
dp
dpx
xm x
(18)
(19)
S — (x — xx)xm — xsp
dp _ -(p — p)xm
dxx S — (x — xx)xm — xsp
Proposition 2
Differentiating (6) w.r.t. px , we then obtain 15
dP |
=dp+ |
1 |
—+— |
xx dp p')CX)2 xp dp. |
(20) | |
By assumption, |
∈p |
p dx = pττ< 0, |
(21) | |||
6P |
p dxs = ——> 0. |
(22) |
15We use brackets with superscript 2, (x)2 to define x square function. The superscript 2
without brackets represents variables for the type-2 household.
27
More intriguing information
1. An Investigation of transience upon mothers of primary-aged children and their school2. The name is absent
3. Segmentación en la era de la globalización: ¿Cómo encontrar un segmento nuevo de mercado?
4. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Land Police in Mozambique: Future Perspectives
8. Non-farm businesses local economic integration level: the case of six Portuguese small and medium-sized Markettowns• - a sector approach
9. XML PUBLISHING SOLUTIONS FOR A COMPANY
10. The name is absent