Substituting (21) into (20) gives
dP x
=≡ = - +
dp x
Px
6p
x
dP
J dp
Substituting for dp
from (18) and using x = xs gives
dP
dP)
χ________1________Γs_ χ/ s _ (p-Px ʌ
xS- (x-x∖^-χs S rΛ6P m 6m6P)
X y x x χ x ^m x p p IIU
> 0.
(23)
Differentiating (6) w.r.t. x, we obtain
dP
dx)
dp
dx
x) dp 1 x
+ ~μ + — (P - P) + (P - P) —2 xP
x dx x (x)2
dp
dxP
-x
px
6P
x
dp
dxP
1 (P - P).
x
Substituting for dp∙ from (19) and using x = xs, we obtain
dP
dxP
S — (x — x)xm — xp
xp (6P
(p — p)p
m
6m6p)
< 0.
(24)
Proposition 3
Differentiating (8), and using Roy’s identity,
dv = Vpdp + vm dpp — Λ P = -vm dp (x — x) + x
dp> dp ∖Pp J dp>
28
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Moi individuel et moi cosmique Dans la pensee de Romain Rolland
3. The name is absent
4. IMPACTS OF EPA DAIRY WASTE REGULATIONS ON FARM PROFITABILITY
5. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
6. An Empirical Analysis of the Curvature Factor of the Term Structure of Interest Rates
7. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
8. TOWARDS THE ZERO ACCIDENT GOAL: ASSISTING THE FIRST OFFICER MONITOR AND CHALLENGE CAPTAIN ERRORS
9. Strengthening civil society from the outside? Donor driven consultation and participation processes in Poverty Reduction Strategies (PRSP): the Bolivian case
10. A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERINVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL R&D