Table 2. Regime-switching modelling of implied volatility | |
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 | |
w1 Y1 γ 2 Ψ2 W1 = w 2 LL |
Model parameters ∣ 0.2664a -0.0129a 0.2581a 0.0033a 01612a 0.0093a 0.1561a 0.0035a 1.1093a 0.9810a 0.9393a 0.9796a -0.5693a -0.2328a -0.6094a -0.6226a -0.3991a 0.0632a -0.5627a -1.4508a 40.4928a 7.0033a 90.7546a 9.9678a Hypothesis tests ∣ 6074.104a 122.558a 5423.406a 0.0377 585.366a 0.0798 1.588 45.094a 0.118 1184.4911a 50.754a 12.8244a 2.022 50.034a 2.626 71.5032a 7166.36 11997.22 7369.75 13491.68 |
Notes: Significance at the 1, 5 and 10 % level is denoted by a, b and vt = wi + βirt-1 + γi rt2-1 +ζt for Model 3, and vt = wi +δivt-1 + βirt-1 + γi rt2-1 +ζt for Model 4. The null |
hypothesis tests are distributed asχ2(1) . LL is the log maximum
likelihood function.
22
More intriguing information
1. Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region2. A Rational Analysis of Alternating Search and Reflection Strategies in Problem Solving
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
6. Une Classe de Concepts
7. The Role of Evidence in Establishing Trust in Repositories
8. Globalization, Divergence and Stagnation
9. Testing the Information Matrix Equality with Robust Estimators
10. The name is absent