Table 2. Regime-switching modelling of implied volatility | |
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 | |
w1 Y1 γ 2 Ψ2 W1 = w 2 LL |
Model parameters ∣ 0.2664a -0.0129a 0.2581a 0.0033a 01612a 0.0093a 0.1561a 0.0035a 1.1093a 0.9810a 0.9393a 0.9796a -0.5693a -0.2328a -0.6094a -0.6226a -0.3991a 0.0632a -0.5627a -1.4508a 40.4928a 7.0033a 90.7546a 9.9678a Hypothesis tests ∣ 6074.104a 122.558a 5423.406a 0.0377 585.366a 0.0798 1.588 45.094a 0.118 1184.4911a 50.754a 12.8244a 2.022 50.034a 2.626 71.5032a 7166.36 11997.22 7369.75 13491.68 |
Notes: Significance at the 1, 5 and 10 % level is denoted by a, b and vt = wi + βirt-1 + γi rt2-1 +ζt for Model 3, and vt = wi +δivt-1 + βirt-1 + γi rt2-1 +ζt for Model 4. The null |
hypothesis tests are distributed asχ2(1) . LL is the log maximum
likelihood function.
22
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Olfactory Neuroblastoma: Diagnostic Difficulty
3. A Critical Examination of the Beliefs about Learning a Foreign Language at Primary School
4. Three Strikes and You.re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis
5. HACCP AND MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION
6. The Complexity Era in Economics
7. Are class size differences related to pupils’ educational progress and classroom processes? Findings from the Institute of Education Class Size Study of children aged 5-7 Years
8. International Financial Integration*
9. Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
10. The name is absent