Table 2. Regime-switching modelling of implied volatility | |
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 | |
w1 Y1 γ 2 Ψ2 W1 = w 2 LL |
Model parameters ∣ 0.2664a -0.0129a 0.2581a 0.0033a 01612a 0.0093a 0.1561a 0.0035a 1.1093a 0.9810a 0.9393a 0.9796a -0.5693a -0.2328a -0.6094a -0.6226a -0.3991a 0.0632a -0.5627a -1.4508a 40.4928a 7.0033a 90.7546a 9.9678a Hypothesis tests ∣ 6074.104a 122.558a 5423.406a 0.0377 585.366a 0.0798 1.588 45.094a 0.118 1184.4911a 50.754a 12.8244a 2.022 50.034a 2.626 71.5032a 7166.36 11997.22 7369.75 13491.68 |
Notes: Significance at the 1, 5 and 10 % level is denoted by a, b and vt = wi + βirt-1 + γi rt2-1 +ζt for Model 3, and vt = wi +δivt-1 + βirt-1 + γi rt2-1 +ζt for Model 4. The null |
hypothesis tests are distributed asχ2(1) . LL is the log maximum
likelihood function.
22
More intriguing information
1. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads2. Spatial patterns in intermunicipal Danish commuting
3. The name is absent
4. Economie de l’entrepreneur faits et théories (The economics of entrepreneur facts and theories)
5. AJAE Appendix: Willingness to Pay Versus Expected Consumption Value in Vickrey Auctions for New Experience Goods
6. The Response of Ethiopian Grain Markets to Liberalization
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
10. Who runs the IFIs?