Table 6.A Estimated resource use and costs per acre for field operations, Cabbage (spring), transplant, irrigated, fresh market
one-row equipment, average yield, Louisiana, 1997.
OPERATION/ OPERATING INPUT |
SIZE/ |
TRACTOR |
PERF |
TIMES |
MT H |
TRACTOR COST |
EQUIP COST |
ALLOC LABOR |
OPERATING INPUT |
TOTAL | |||||
-D-I-R-E-C-T-- |
------ FIXED |
------- DIRECT |
------- FIXED |
-H-OU-R-S-- |
----C-O-S-T |
-A-M-O-U-N-T-- |
--P-RI-C-E-- |
----CO--ST- | |||||||
__-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- |
_-_-_-_-d__ol__l |
_a_r_s-_-_-__- |
_-_-_-_--__--__ |
__d_o_l_l_a_r_s_ |
_-_-_--_-_-__- |
_d_o_l_la__rs__- |
_-_-_--_-_-__- | ||||||||
LDiimsek (2sRpread) Boom sprayer |
cwt |
1.00 |
Jan |
6.6000 |
1.60 |
10.56 |
10.56 | ||||||||
6 ft |
4 3 |
0.570 |
2.00 |
Jan |
5.7 9 |
2.9 2 |
0.75 |
1.07 |
1.254 |
9.4 0 |
19.94 | ||||
12 ft |
23 |
0.190 |
1.00 |
Jan |
0.70 |
0.31 |
0.26 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.57 |
3.12 | ||||
Treflan |
6 pftt |
1.250 0 |
3.75 |
4.69 |
4.69 | ||||||||||
Disk 2R |
4 3 |
0.570 |
1.0 0 |
Jan |
2.8 9 |
1.4 6 |
0.38 |
0.54 |
0.627 |
4.7 0 |
9.97 | ||||
Hipper-fert 1R |
3 ft |
23 |
1.550 |
1.00 |
Jan |
5.71 |
2.56 |
0.91 |
1.29 |
1.705 |
12.79 |
23.26 | |||
lb |
500.000 0 |
0.13 |
65.00 |
65.00 | |||||||||||
Hipper 1R |
3 ft |
2 3 |
1.530 |
1.0 0 |
Jan |
5.6 3 |
2.5 3 |
0.50 |
0.72 |
1.683 |
12.6 2 |
22.01 | |||
Row conditioner 1R |
6 ft |
23 |
0.410 |
1.00 |
Jan |
1.51 |
0.68 |
0.08 |
0.12 |
0.451 |
3.38 |
5.77 | |||
Trailer utility Planting labor Cabbage plants |
10 ft |
23 |
1.000 |
1.00 |
Jan |
3.68 |
1.65 |
0.40 |
1.43 |
1.100 |
8.25 |
15.41 | |||
hour |
20.000 0 |
7.50 |
150.00 |
150.00 | |||||||||||
100 |
100.0000 |
3.60 |
360.00 |
360.00 | |||||||||||
Furrow irrigation Cult-fert 1R |
acin |
1.0 0 |
Feb |
6.88 |
505..8510 |
2.000 |
1135..0280 |
2.0000 |
77.38 | ||||||
3 ft |
23 |
1.610 |
1.00 |
Feb |
5.9 3 |
2.6 6 |
0.57 |
1.771 |
23.24 | ||||||
Ammonium Nitrate |
33% lb |
100.000 0 |
0.13 |
13.00 |
13.00 | ||||||||||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0.190 |
1.0 0 |
Ma r |
0.7 0 |
0.3 1 |
0.26 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.5 7 |
3.12 | |||
Ambush |
pptt |
01..025000 00 |
13.88 3.00 |
3.47 3.00 |
3.47 3.00 | ||||||||||
3 pftt |
1.0000 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 | |||||||||||
Cult-fert 1R |
2 3 |
1.610 |
1.0 0 |
Ma r |
5.9 3 |
2.66 |
0.57 |
0.81 |
1.771 |
13.2 8 |
23.24 | ||||
Ammonium Nitrate |
33% lb |
100.000 0 |
0.13 |
13.00 |
13.00 | ||||||||||
Cultivator 1R |
3 ft |
2 3 |
1.530 |
1.0 0 |
Ma r |
5.6 3 |
2.5 3 |
0.40 |
0.57 |
1.683 |
12.6 2 |
21.76 | |||
FCuurlrto-wfeirrtri1gRation |
acin |
1.00 |
Mar |
6.88 |
2.000 |
15.00 |
2.000 0 |
21.88 | |||||||
3 ft |
2 3 |
1.610 |
1.00 |
Apr |
5.9 3 |
2.6 6 |
0.57 |
0.81 |
1.771 |
13.28 |
23.24 | ||||
Ammonium Nitrate |
33% lb |
100.000 0 |
0.13 |
13.00 |
13.00 | ||||||||||
Cultivator 1R |
3 ft |
2 3 |
10 ..1539 00 |
1.0 0 |
Ap r |
5.6 3 |
02..35 13 |
0.40 |
00..2578 |
10 ..2680 93 |
12.6 2 |
21.76 | |||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
23 |
1.00 |
Apr |
0.70 |
0.26 |
1.57 |
3.12 | |||||||
pt |
0.250 0 |
13.88 |
3.47 |
3.47 | |||||||||||
Dipel Pickup truck |
pt |
11 .. 0000 0000 |
3.00 2.00 |
3.00 2.00 |
3.00 2.00 | ||||||||||
½ ton |
1.000 |
10.0 0 |
Ma y |
41.56 |
33.63 |
10.000 |
75.0 0 |
150.19 | |||||||
Trailer utility Harvest labor Packing labor |
10 ft |
2 3 |
1.000 |
2.00 |
May |
7.3 6 |
3.3 1 |
0.80 |
2.86 |
2.200 |
16.50 |
30.82 | |||
hour |
1.00 1.00 |
May |
1321..000000 00 |
7.50 7.50 |
240.00 |
240.00 | |||||||||
Packing sacks |
each |
450.0000 |
0.50 |
225.00 |
225.00 | ||||||||||
Middle buster 1R |
3 ft |
2 3 |
1.530 |
1.0 0 |
Ma y |
55..6633 |
2.5 3 |
0.22 |
0.31 |
11..6688 33 |
1122..6622 |
21.31 | |||
Hipper 1R |
3 ft |
23 |
1.530 |
1.00 |
May |
2.53 |
0.50 |
0.72 |
22.01 | ||||||
TOTALS |
---7-4-.-9-8 - |
--3-4-.1--6 - |
--6-3.-1-6- |
--1-0-2.--58- |
-3-5-.6-9-2- |
--2-6-7-.-6-9 |
-1-1-9-3.--69- |
-1-7-36-.-2--6 | |||||||
INTEREST ON OPERATING CAPITAL |
39.03 | ||||||||||||||
UNALLOCATED LABOR TOTAL SPECIFIED COS |
0.00 | ||||||||||||||
T |
1775.29 |
H-14
More intriguing information
1. Political Rents, Promotion Incentives, and Support for a Non-Democratic Regime2. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective
3. EMU: some unanswered questions
4. Meat Slaughter and Processing Plants’ Traceability Levels Evidence From Iowa
5. A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities
6. DISCUSSION: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS OF EMERGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
7. The name is absent
8. Understanding the (relative) fall and rise of construction wages
9. The name is absent
10. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note