Table 5.A Estimated resource use and costs per acre for field operations, Cabbage (fall), direct seeded, irrigated, fresh market,
one-row equipment, average yield, Louisiana, 1997.
OPERATION/ OPERATING INPUT |
SIZE/ |
TRACTOR |
PERF |
TIMES |
MT H |
TRACTOR COST |
EQUIP COST |
ALLOC LABOR |
OPERATING INPUT |
TOTAL | |||||
-D-I-R-EC--T-- |
-F--I-XE--D |
-D-I-R-EC--T-- |
--F-I-XE--D |
-H-OU-R--S- |
---C-OS--T |
-A-M-O-U-N-T-- |
--P-RI-C-E-- |
---C-O--S-T | |||||||
_-_-_-_--__--__- |
----dollars----- |
_-_-_--_-_-__ |
_d_o_l_la__rs__ |
_-_-_--_-_-__- |
_d_o_l_la__rs__- |
_-_-_--_-_-__- | |||||||||
Lime (spread) |
cwt |
1.00 |
Jul |
6.6000 |
1.60 |
10.56 |
10.56 | ||||||||
Disk 2R |
6 ft |
4 3 |
0.570 |
2.00 |
Jul |
5.7 9 |
20..9982 |
0.7 5 |
1.07 |
1.25 4 |
9.4 0 |
19.94 | |||
Disk-pre-1-2R Middle buster 1R Hipper-fert 1R |
6 ft 3 pftt 3 ft |
23 |
0.590 |
1.00 |
Jul |
2.17 |
0.49 |
0.70 |
4.87 |
1.250 0 |
3.75 |
4.69 |
9.21 4.69 | ||
2 3 23 |
1.530 1.550 |
1.0 0 1.00 |
JJuull |
5.6 3 5.71 |
22..5563 |
0.2 2 |
10..32 19 |
11..768035 |
12.6 2 12.79 |
21.31 23.26 | |||||
lb |
500.000 0 |
0.13 |
65.00 |
65.00 | |||||||||||
Hipper 1R |
3 ft |
2 3 |
10..4531 00 |
2.0 0 |
Aug |
11.2 6 |
5.0 6 |
1.0 1 |
1.44 |
3.36 6 |
253..3285 |
44.01 | |||
Row conditioner 1R |
6 ft |
23 |
1.00 |
Aug |
1.51 |
0.68 |
0.08 |
0.12 |
0.451 |
5.77 | |||||
Planter 1R |
3 ft |
23 |
1.500 |
1.00 |
Aug |
5.52 |
2.48 |
0.35 |
0.56 |
1.650 |
12.38 |
21.29 270.00 | |||
Cabbage seed |
lb |
110..00000000 |
270.00 |
270.00 | |||||||||||
Other labor |
hour |
1.0 0 |
Aug |
7.50 |
75.00 |
75.00 | |||||||||
Boom sprayer Ambush |
12 ft |
23 |
0.190 |
1.00 |
Sep |
0.7 0 |
0.3 1 |
0.2 6 |
0.28 |
0.20 9 |
1.5 7 |
01..025000 00 |
133..80 80 |
3.47 3.00 |
3.12 3.47 3.00 |
pt |
1.0000 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 | |||||||||||
Cult-fert 1R |
33% ltb |
2 3 |
1.610 |
1.0 0 |
Se p |
5.9 3 |
2.6 6 |
0.5 7 |
0.81 |
1.77 1 |
13.2 8 |
23.24 | |||
Ammonium Nitrate |
100.000 0 |
0.13 |
13.00 |
13.00 | |||||||||||
FCuurlrto-wfeirrtri1gRation |
acin |
1.0 0 |
Sep |
6.88 |
55.5 0 |
12.7.7010 0 |
15.00 |
2.0000 |
77.38 | ||||||
3 ft |
2 3 |
1.610 |
1.00 |
Sep |
5.9 3 |
2.6 6 |
0.57 |
0.81 |
13.28 |
23.24 | |||||
Ammonium Nitrate |
33% lb |
100.000 0 |
0.13 |
13.00 |
13.00 | ||||||||||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0.190 |
1.0 0 |
Se p |
0.7 0 |
0.3 1 |
0.2 6 |
0.28 |
0.20 9 |
1.5 7 |
3.12 | |||
pt 3 pft |
12..000000 00 |
12.56 |
12.56 1.56 |
12.56 1.56 | |||||||||||
Cult-fert 1R |
2 3 |
1.610 |
1.0 0 |
Oc t |
5.9 3 |
2.6 6 |
0.5 7 |
0.81 |
1.77 1 |
13.28 |
23.24 | ||||
Ammonium Nitrate |
33% lb |
100.000 0 |
0.13 |
13.00 |
13.00 | ||||||||||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0.190 |
1.0 0 |
Oc t |
0.7 0 |
0.3 1 |
0.2 6 |
0.28 |
0.20 9 |
1.5 7 |
3.12 | |||
pt |
0.250 0 |
13.88 |
3.47 |
3.47 | |||||||||||
Dipel |
pt |
1.0000 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 | ||||||||||
pt |
1.0000 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 | |||||||||||
Furrow irrigation |
acin |
1.0 0 |
Oc t |
6.88 |
2.000 |
15.00 |
2.0000 |
21.88 | |||||||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0.190 |
1.00 |
Nov |
0.7 0 |
0.3 1 |
0.26 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.57 |
3.12 | |||
Ambush |
pt |
0.250 0 |
13.88 |
3.47 |
3.47 | ||||||||||
Dipel |
pt |
1.0000 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 | ||||||||||
pt |
1.0000 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 | |||||||||||
Furrow irrigation |
acin |
2 3 |
1.000 |
1.00 |
No v |
7.3 6 |
3.3 1 |
6.8 8 |
2.86 |
22 ..2000 00 |
11 65..50 00 |
2.0000 |
21.88 30.82 | ||
Harvest labor |
hour |
1.00 |
Dec |
32.000 0 |
7.50 |
240.00 |
240.00 | ||||||||
Packing labor Packing sacks |
hour |
1.00 |
Dec |
11.0000 |
7.50 |
82.50 |
82.50 | ||||||||
each |
450.0000 |
0.50 |
225.00 |
225.00 | |||||||||||
PDiicskkup2Rtruck |
½ ton 6 ft |
4 3 |
10 ..5007 00 |
10.0 0 2.00 |
Dec |
5.7 9 |
2.9 2 |
41.5 6 |
33.63 1.07 |
110..205040 |
75.0 0 9.40 |
150.19 19.94 | |||
TOTALS |
- |
------- 71.32 |
--3-2-.6--7 - |
------- 70.31 |
-1-0-2.-0-9- |
-3-6-.-36--1 - |
------ 272.71 |
-1-0-5-1.--28- |
-1-6-00-.-3--8 | ||||||
INTEREST ON OPERATING CAPITAL |
35.88 | ||||||||||||||
UNALLOCATED LABOR |
0.00 | ||||||||||||||
TOTAL SPECIFIED COST |
1636.26 |
H-12
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Chebyshev polynomial approximation to approximate partial differential equations
3. A Multimodal Framework for Computer Mediated Learning: The Reshaping of Curriculum Knowledge and Learning
4. TOWARD CULTURAL ONCOLOGY: THE EVOLUTIONARY INFORMATION DYNAMICS OF CANCER
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Handling the measurement error problem by means of panel data: Moment methods applied on firm data