Table 4.A Estimated resource use and costs per acre for field operations, Broccoli, irrigated, transplanted, fresh market, one-row
equipment, average yield, Louisiana, 1997.
TRACTOR COST |
EQU |
IP COST |
ALLOC LABOR |
OPERATING |
INPUT | ||||||||||
O P E R A T I O N/ |
S I Z E / |
T R A C T O R |
P E R F |
T I M E S |
TOTAL | ||||||||||
OPERATING INPUT |
UNIT |
SIZE |
RATE |
OVER |
M T H |
-D-I-R-E-C-T- - |
- -F-I-XE--D |
-D-I-R-EC--T -- |
- -F-IX-E-D- |
-H-OU-R-S-- |
- - - -C-O-S-T |
-A-M-O-U-N-T- - |
- -P-RI-C-E-- |
- - - -CO--ST- |
COST |
_ _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- |
_-_-_-_-d__ol__l |
_a_r_s_--__--__- |
_-_-_--_-_-__ |
__d_o_l_l_a_r_s_ |
_-_-_--_-_-__- |
_d_o_l_la__rs__- |
_-_-_--_-_-__- | ||||||||
Lime (spread) Middle buster 1R |
cwt |
1.00 |
Jul |
6.6000 |
1.60 |
10.56 |
10.56 | ||||||||
3 ft |
2 3 |
1 5 3 0 |
1.00 |
Jul |
5 6 3 |
22 95 23 |
0 2 2 |
0. 3 1 |
11 26 85 34 |
1 29 64 20 |
21.31 | ||||
Disk 2R |
6 ft |
43 |
0.570 |
2.00 |
Jul |
5.79 |
0.75 |
1.07 |
19.94 | ||||||
Disk-pre-1-2R |
6 ft |
23 |
0.590 |
1.00 |
Jul |
2.17 |
0.98 |
0.49 |
0.70 |
0.649 |
4.87 |
9.21 | |||
3 pftt |
1 0 0 0 0 |
3. 7 5 |
3 75 |
3.75 | |||||||||||
Hipper-fert 1R |
2 3 |
1 5 5 0 |
1. 0 0 |
J u l |
5 7 1 |
2 5 6 |
0 9 1 |
1. 2 9 |
1 7 05 |
1 2 7 9 |
23.26 | ||||
lb |
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
0. 1 3 |
7 8 00 |
78.00 | |||||||||||
Hipper 1R Row conditioner 1R |
3 ft 6 ft |
22 33 |
10 45 31 00 |
2. 0 0 1.00 |
Aug |
1 1 2 6 1.51 |
50 60 86 |
1 0 1 |
1. 4 4 0.12 |
3 3 6 6 |
2 35 2385 |
44.01 5.77 | |||
Trailer utility |
10 ft |
23 |
1.000 |
1.00 |
Aug |
3.68 |
1.65 |
0.40 |
1.43 |
1.100 |
8.25 |
15.41 | |||
Broccoli plants Planting labor |
100 |
1 2205 00 0000 00 |
4. 0 0 7.50 |
4 8 0 00 187.50 |
480.00 187.50 | ||||||||||
Other labor |
hour |
1. 0 0 |
SA eu gp |
2.0000 |
7.50 |
15.00 |
15.00 | ||||||||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0 1 9 0 |
1.00 |
0 7 0 |
0 3 1 |
0 2 6 |
0. 2 8 |
0 2 0 9 |
1 5 7 |
3.12 | ||||
lb |
1 0 0 0 0 |
8. 0 0 |
8 00 |
8.00 | |||||||||||
Cult-fert 1R |
3 ft 33% lb |
2 3 |
1 6 1 0 |
1. 0 0 |
Sep |
5 9 3 |
2 6 6 |
0 5 7 |
0. 8 1 |
1 7 7 1 |
1 3 2 8 |
23.24 | |||
Ammonium Nitrate |
1 5 20 00 00 00 00 |
0. 1 3 |
1 9 50 |
19.50 | |||||||||||
Furrow irrigation |
acin |
1. 0 0 |
S e p |
6 8 8 |
5 5. 5 0 |
2 0 0 0 |
1 5 0 0 |
77.38 | |||||||
Cultivator 1R |
3 ft |
22 33 |
10 15 39 00 |
1.00 |
SOecpt |
5 6 3 |
2 5 3 |
00..2406 |
0.57 |
10..260893 |
12.62 |
21.76 | |||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
1.00 |
0.70 |
0.31 |
0.28 |
1.57 |
3.12 | ||||||||
pt |
0 2 5 0 0 |
1 3. 8 8 |
3 47 |
3.47 | |||||||||||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0 1 9 0 |
1. 0 0 |
O c t |
0 7 0 |
0 3 1 |
0 2 6 |
0. 2 8 |
0 2 0 9 |
1 5 7 |
3.12 | |||
Bravo Furrow irrigation Cult-fert 1R |
pt |
1. 0 0 |
O c t |
6 8 8 |
2 0 0 0 |
11 35 0208 |
12 05 0000 00 |
6. 3 8 |
9 57 |
9.57 21.88 | |||||
3 ft |
2 3 |
1 6 1 0 |
1.00 |
Oct |
5 9 3 |
2 6 6 |
0.57 |
0. 8 1 |
1.771 |
23.24 | |||||
Ammonium Nitrate |
33% lb |
1 5 0 0 0 0 0 |
0. 1 3 |
1 9 50 |
19.50 | ||||||||||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0 1 9 0 |
1. 0 0 |
O c t |
0 7 0 |
0 3 1 |
0 2 6 |
0. 2 8 |
0 2 0 9 |
1 5 7 |
3.12 | |||
pt |
1 0 0 0 0 |
1 2. 5 6 |
1 2 56 |
12.56 | |||||||||||
Crop oil |
pt |
2.0000 |
0.78 |
1.56 |
1.56 | ||||||||||
BoAom bsphrayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0 1 9 0 |
1. 0 0 |
N o v |
0 7 0 |
0 3 1 |
0 2 6 |
0. 2 8 |
0 2 0 9 |
1 5 7 |
3.12 | |||
pt |
0 2 5 0 0 |
1 3. 8 8 |
3 47 |
3.47 | |||||||||||
C u Almt-ufser t 1 R |
3 ft |
2 3 |
1 6 1 0 |
1 0 0 |
Nov |
5 9 3 |
2 6 6 |
0 5 7 |
0. 8 1 |
1 7 7 1 |
1 3 2 8 |
23.24 | |||
Ammonium Nitrate |
33% lb |
1 502 00 0000 00 |
0. 1 3 |
1 9 50 |
19.50 | ||||||||||
Furrow irrigation |
acin |
1. 0 0 |
N o v |
6 8 8 |
2 0 0 0 |
1 5 0 0 |
21.88 | ||||||||
B o oAmm bsupsrha y e r |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0 19 0 |
1.00 |
Nov |
0 7 0 |
0 3 1 |
0.26 |
0. 2 8 |
0.209 |
1.57 |
3.12 | |||
pt |
0 2 5 0 0 |
1 3. 8 8 |
3 47 |
3.47 | |||||||||||
Harvest labor |
hour |
1. 0 0 |
N o v |
30.0000 |
7.50 |
225.00 |
225.00 | ||||||||
Rubber bands |
lb |
1.0000 |
53..0000 |
5.00 |
5.00 | ||||||||||
harvest container each |
8.0000 |
24.00 |
24.00 | ||||||||||||
Packing labor |
hour |
1. 0 0 |
N o v |
8.0000 |
7.50 |
60.00 |
60.00 | ||||||||
PacIking boxes |
each |
1.00 |
Nov |
300.0000 |
21 3105 |
330.00 |
330.00 | ||||||||
cwt |
30.0000 |
70.50 |
70.50 | ||||||||||||
P icckeu p t ru c k Disk 2R |
½ ton |
1 0 0 0 |
5. 0 0 |
N o v |
2 0 7 8 |
1 6. 8 1 |
5 0 0 0 |
3 7 5 0 |
75.09 | ||||||
6 ft |
4 3 |
0.570 |
1.00 |
Nov |
2 8 9 |
1 4 6 |
0.38 |
0.54 |
0.627 |
4.70 |
9.97 | ||||
T O T A L S |
- - -6-6--2-5 - |
- -3-0- 2--4 - |
- -4-9- 3--4 - |
- -8-3-8-8- |
-3-0-0-8-5- |
- -2-2-5--6-4 |
-1-5-8-9--91- |
-2-0-45--2--6 | |||||||
INTEREST ON OPERATING CAPITAL | |||||||||||||||
UNALLOCATED LABOR TOTAL SPECIFIED COS |
0.00 | ||||||||||||||
T |
2087.21 |
H-10
More intriguing information
1. Structural Conservation Practices in U.S. Corn Production: Evidence on Environmental Stewardship by Program Participants and Non-Participants2. The name is absent
3. The demand for urban transport: An application of discrete choice model for Cadiz
4. On the Relation between Robust and Bayesian Decision Making
5. MATHEMATICS AS AN EXACT AND PRECISE LANGUAGE OF NATURE
6. The name is absent
7. Personal Experience: A Most Vicious and Limited Circle!? On the Role of Entrepreneurial Experience for Firm Survival
8. Subduing High Inflation in Romania. How to Better Monetary and Exchange Rate Mechanisms?
9. Importing Feminist Criticism
10. The name is absent