PROJECTED COSTS FOR SELECTED LOUISIANA VEGETABLE CROPS - 1997 SEASON



Table 3.A Estimated resource use and costs per acre for field operations, Beans (Snap), fresh market, one-row equipment, average yield
Louisiana, 1997.

OPERATION/

OPERATING INPUT

SIZE/
UNIT

TRACTOR
SIZE

PERF
RATE

TIMES
OVER

MT H

TRACTOR COST

EQUIP COST

ALLOC LABOR

OPERATING INPUT

TOTAL
COST

-D-I-R-E-C-T--

------

FIXED

--------

DIRECT

------

FIXED

-H-OU-R-S--

----C-O-S-T

-A-M-O-U-N-T--

--P-RI-C-E--

----CO--ST-

__-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-

_-_-_-_-d__ol__l

_a_r_s_--__--__-

_-_-_--_-_-__

__d_o_l_l_a_r_s_

_-_-_--_-_-__-

_d_o_l_la__rs__-

_-_-_--_-_-__-

DDLiiissmkke 22(RsRpread)

cwt

1.00

Feb

6.6000

1.60

10.56

10.56

6 ft

4 3

0.570

1.00

Feb

2.8 9

1.4 6

0.3 8

0.54

0.627

4.7 0

9.97

6 ft

43

0.570

2.00

Mar

5.79

2.92

0.75

1.07

1.254

9.40

19.94

Boom sprayer
Treflan

12 ft

23

0.190

1.00

Mar

0.70

0.31

0.26

0.28

0.209

1.57

3.12

pt

1.250 0

3.75

4.69

4.69

Dual

pt

1.5000

7.85

11.78

11.78

Disk 2R

6 ft

4 3

0.570

1.0 0

Mar

2.8 9

1.4 6

0.3 8

0.54

0.627

4.7 0

9.97

Hipper-fert 1R

3 ft

23

1.550

1.00

Mar

5.71

2.56

0.91

1.29

1.705

12.79

23.26

8-24-24

lb

400.000 0

0.13

52.00

52.00

Hipper 1R

3 ft

2 3

1.53 0

2.0 0

Mar

11.2 6

5.0 6

1.0 1

1.44

3.366

25.2 5

44.01

Row conditioner 1R

6 ft

23

0.410

1.00

Mar

1.51

0.68

0.08

0.12

0.451

3.38

5.77

Planter 1R

3 ft

23

1.500

1.00

Mar

5.52

2.48

0.35

0.56

1.650

12.38

21.29

Snap bean seeds

lb

40.000 0

1.70

68.00

68.00

Boom sprayer

12 ft

2 3

0.190

1.0 0

Apr

0.7 0

0.31

0.2 6

0.28

0.209

1.5 7

3.12

Orthene

lb

0.500 0

11.80

5.90

5.90

Bravo

Other labor

pt

1.5000

6.38

9.57

9.57

hour

1.0 0

Apr

6.0000

7.50

45.00

45.00

Boom sprayer

12 ft

2 3

0.190

1.00

Apr

0.7 0

0.3 1

0.2 6

0.28

0.209

1.5 7

3.12

Basagran

3 pftt

1.000 0

8.29

8.29

8.29

Cultivator 1R

2 3

1.530

1.0 0

Apr

5.6 3

2.5 3

0.4 0

0.57

1.683

12.6 2

21.76

Boom sprayer

12 ft

23

0.190

1.00

Apr

0.70

0.31

0.26

0.28

0.209

1.57

3.12

Orthene

lb

0.500 0

11.80

5.90

5.90

Boom sprayer
Poast

12 ft

2 3

0.190

1.0 0

Apr

0.7 0

0.3 1

0.2 6

0.28

0.209

1.5 7

3.12

pt

1.000 0

12.56

12.56

12.56

Crop oil

pt

2.0000

0.78

1.56

1.56

Boom sprayer

12 ft

2 3

0.190

1.0 0

Ma y

0.7 0

0.3 1

0.2 6

0.28

0.20 9

1.5 7

3.12

Sevin
Benlate

lb

1.000 0

4.40

4.40

4.40

lb

1.0000

15.80

15.80

15.80

Boom sprayer

12 ft

2 3

0.190

1.0 0

May

0.7 0

0.3 1

0.2 6

0.28

0.209

1.5 7

3.12

Sevin

lb

1.000 0

4.40

4.40

4.40

Benlate

lb

1.0000

15.80

15.80

15.80

Trailer utility

10 ft

2 3

1.000

1.0 0

Jun

3.6 8

1.6 5

0.4 0

1.43

1.100

8.2 5

15.41

Harvest labor

bu

1.00

Jun

150.000 0

10.0000

3.00

450.00

450.00

harvest container

each

3.00

30.00

30.00

Bushel hampers

each

50.0000

2.16

108.00

108.00

Pickup truck

½ ton

1.000

5.0 0

Jun

20.7 8

16.81

5.000

37.5 0

75.09

Disk 2R

6 ft

4 3

0.570

1.00

Jun

2.8 9

1.4 6

0.38

0.54

0.627

4.70

9.97

TOTALS

---5-2-.-6-8 -

--2-4-.4--6 -

--2-7-.6--4 -

--2-6.-8-7-

-1-9-.5-5-3-

--1-4-6-.-6-5

--8-6-4.--20-

-1-1-42-.-5--0

INTEREST ON OPERATING CAPITAL

18.13

UNALLOCATED LABOR
TOTAL SPECIFIED COST

0.00

1160.63

H-8



More intriguing information

1. The duration of fixed exchange rate regimes
2. The Economic Value of Basin Protection to Improve the Quality and Reliability of Potable Water Supply: Some Evidence from Ecuador
3. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
4. The name is absent
5. A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities
6. Experimental Evidence of Risk Aversion in Consumer Markets: The Case of Beef Tenderness
7. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Solidaristic Wage Bargaining