Table 3.A Estimated resource use and costs per acre for field operations, Beans (Snap), fresh market, one-row equipment, average yield
Louisiana, 1997.
|
OPERATION/ OPERATING INPUT |
SIZE/ |
TRACTOR |
PERF |
TIMES |
MT H |
TRACTOR COST |
EQUIP COST |
ALLOC LABOR |
OPERATING INPUT |
TOTAL | |||||
|
-D-I-R-E-C-T-- |
------ FIXED |
-------- DIRECT |
------ FIXED |
-H-OU-R-S-- |
----C-O-S-T |
-A-M-O-U-N-T-- |
--P-RI-C-E-- |
----CO--ST- | |||||||
|
__-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- |
_-_-_-_-d__ol__l |
_a_r_s_--__--__- |
_-_-_--_-_-__ |
__d_o_l_l_a_r_s_ |
_-_-_--_-_-__- |
_d_o_l_la__rs__- |
_-_-_--_-_-__- | ||||||||
|
DDLiiissmkke 22(RsRpread) |
cwt |
1.00 |
Feb |
6.6000 |
1.60 |
10.56 |
10.56 | ||||||||
|
6 ft |
4 3 |
0.570 |
1.00 |
Feb |
2.8 9 |
1.4 6 |
0.3 8 |
0.54 |
0.627 |
4.7 0 |
9.97 | ||||
|
6 ft |
43 |
0.570 |
2.00 |
Mar |
5.79 |
2.92 |
0.75 |
1.07 |
1.254 |
9.40 |
19.94 | ||||
|
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
23 |
0.190 |
1.00 |
Mar |
0.70 |
0.31 |
0.26 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.57 |
3.12 | |||
|
pt |
1.250 0 |
3.75 |
4.69 |
4.69 | |||||||||||
|
Dual |
pt |
1.5000 |
7.85 |
11.78 |
11.78 | ||||||||||
|
Disk 2R |
6 ft |
4 3 |
0.570 |
1.0 0 |
Mar |
2.8 9 |
1.4 6 |
0.3 8 |
0.54 |
0.627 |
4.7 0 |
9.97 | |||
|
Hipper-fert 1R |
3 ft |
23 |
1.550 |
1.00 |
Mar |
5.71 |
2.56 |
0.91 |
1.29 |
1.705 |
12.79 |
23.26 | |||
|
8-24-24 |
lb |
400.000 0 |
0.13 |
52.00 |
52.00 | ||||||||||
|
Hipper 1R |
3 ft |
2 3 |
1.53 0 |
2.0 0 |
Mar |
11.2 6 |
5.0 6 |
1.0 1 |
1.44 |
3.366 |
25.2 5 |
44.01 | |||
|
Row conditioner 1R |
6 ft |
23 |
0.410 |
1.00 |
Mar |
1.51 |
0.68 |
0.08 |
0.12 |
0.451 |
3.38 |
5.77 | |||
|
Planter 1R |
3 ft |
23 |
1.500 |
1.00 |
Mar |
5.52 |
2.48 |
0.35 |
0.56 |
1.650 |
12.38 |
21.29 | |||
|
Snap bean seeds |
lb |
40.000 0 |
1.70 |
68.00 |
68.00 | ||||||||||
|
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0.190 |
1.0 0 |
Apr |
0.7 0 |
0.31 |
0.2 6 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.5 7 |
3.12 | |||
|
Orthene |
lb |
0.500 0 |
11.80 |
5.90 |
5.90 | ||||||||||
|
Bravo Other labor |
pt |
1.5000 |
6.38 |
9.57 |
9.57 | ||||||||||
|
hour |
1.0 0 |
Apr |
6.0000 |
7.50 |
45.00 |
45.00 | |||||||||
|
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0.190 |
1.00 |
Apr |
0.7 0 |
0.3 1 |
0.2 6 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.5 7 |
3.12 | |||
|
Basagran |
3 pftt |
1.000 0 |
8.29 |
8.29 |
8.29 | ||||||||||
|
Cultivator 1R |
2 3 |
1.530 |
1.0 0 |
Apr |
5.6 3 |
2.5 3 |
0.4 0 |
0.57 |
1.683 |
12.6 2 |
21.76 | ||||
|
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
23 |
0.190 |
1.00 |
Apr |
0.70 |
0.31 |
0.26 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.57 |
3.12 | |||
|
Orthene |
lb |
0.500 0 |
11.80 |
5.90 |
5.90 | ||||||||||
|
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0.190 |
1.0 0 |
Apr |
0.7 0 |
0.3 1 |
0.2 6 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.5 7 |
3.12 | |||
|
pt |
1.000 0 |
12.56 |
12.56 |
12.56 | |||||||||||
|
Crop oil |
pt |
2.0000 |
0.78 |
1.56 |
1.56 | ||||||||||
|
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0.190 |
1.0 0 |
Ma y |
0.7 0 |
0.3 1 |
0.2 6 |
0.28 |
0.20 9 |
1.5 7 |
3.12 | |||
|
Sevin |
lb |
1.000 0 |
4.40 |
4.40 |
4.40 | ||||||||||
|
lb |
1.0000 |
15.80 |
15.80 |
15.80 | |||||||||||
|
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0.190 |
1.0 0 |
May |
0.7 0 |
0.3 1 |
0.2 6 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.5 7 |
3.12 | |||
|
Sevin |
lb |
1.000 0 |
4.40 |
4.40 |
4.40 | ||||||||||
|
Benlate |
lb |
1.0000 |
15.80 |
15.80 |
15.80 | ||||||||||
|
Trailer utility |
10 ft |
2 3 |
1.000 |
1.0 0 |
Jun |
3.6 8 |
1.6 5 |
0.4 0 |
1.43 |
1.100 |
8.2 5 |
15.41 | |||
|
Harvest labor |
bu |
1.00 |
Jun |
150.000 0 10.0000 |
3.00 |
450.00 |
450.00 | ||||||||
|
harvest container |
each |
3.00 |
30.00 |
30.00 | |||||||||||
|
Bushel hampers |
each |
50.0000 |
2.16 |
108.00 |
108.00 | ||||||||||
|
Pickup truck |
½ ton |
1.000 |
5.0 0 |
Jun |
20.7 8 |
16.81 |
5.000 |
37.5 0 |
75.09 | ||||||
|
Disk 2R |
6 ft |
4 3 |
0.570 |
1.00 |
Jun |
2.8 9 |
1.4 6 |
0.38 |
0.54 |
0.627 |
4.70 |
9.97 | |||
|
TOTALS |
---5-2-.-6-8 - |
--2-4-.4--6 - |
--2-7-.6--4 - |
--2-6.-8-7- |
-1-9-.5-5-3- |
--1-4-6-.-6-5 |
--8-6-4.--20- |
-1-1-42-.-5--0 | |||||||
|
INTEREST ON OPERATING CAPITAL |
18.13 | ||||||||||||||
|
UNALLOCATED LABOR |
0.00 | ||||||||||||||
|
1160.63 | |||||||||||||||
H-8
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
6. The name is absent
7. PROPOSED IMMIGRATION POLICY REFORM & FARM LABOR MARKET OUTCOMES
8. The name is absent
9. Imputing Dairy Producers' Quota Discount Rate Using the Individual Export Milk Program in Quebec
10. Sectoral specialisation in the EU a macroeconomic perspective