Table 26.A Estimated resource use and costs per acre for field operations, Watermelons, fresh market, one-row equipment, average yield,
Louisiana, 1997.
OPERATION/ OPERATING INPUT |
SIZE/ UNIT |
TRACTOR |
PERF RATE |
TIMES OVER |
MTH |
TRACTOR COST |
EQUIP COST |
ALLOC LABOR |
OPERATING |
INPUT |
TOTAL COST | ||||
DIRECT |
------ FIXED |
-------- DIRECT |
------ FIXED |
HOURS |
COST |
AMOUNT |
PRICE |
COST | |||||||
-------- |
----doll |
ars----- |
------ |
dollars |
------- |
dollars- |
------- | ||||||||
Lime (spread) |
cwt |
1.00 |
Feb |
6.6000 |
1.60 |
10.56 |
10.56 | ||||||||
Disk 2R |
6 ft |
43 |
0.570 |
2.00 |
Feb |
5.79 |
2.92 |
0.75 |
1.07 |
1.254 |
9.40 |
19.94 | |||
Middle buster 1R |
3 ft |
23 |
1.530 |
1.00 |
Feb |
5.63 |
2.53 |
0.22 |
0.31 |
1.683 |
12.62 |
21.31 | |||
Hipper-fert 1R |
3 ft |
23 |
1.550 |
1.00 |
Mar |
5.71 |
2.56 |
0.91 |
1.29 |
1.705 |
12.79 |
23.26 | |||
10-20-20 |
lb |
500.0000 |
0.10 |
50.00 |
50.00 | ||||||||||
Hipper 1R |
3 ft |
23 |
1.530 |
1.00 |
Mar |
5.63 |
2.53 |
0.50 |
0.72 |
1.683 |
12.62 |
22.01 | |||
Planter 1R |
3 ft |
23 |
1.500 |
1.00 |
Mar |
5.52 |
2.48 |
0.35 |
0.56 |
1.650 |
12.38 |
21.29 | |||
Watermelon seed |
lb |
1.0000 |
12.50 |
12.50 |
12.50 | ||||||||||
Other labor |
hour |
2.0000 |
7.50 |
15.00 |
15.00 | ||||||||||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
23 |
0.190 |
1.00 |
Mar |
0.70 |
0.31 |
0.26 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.57 |
3.12 | |||
Curbit |
pt |
3.0000 |
4.54 |
13.62 |
13.62 | ||||||||||
Cultivator 1R |
3 ft |
23 |
1.530 |
1.00 |
Apr |
5.63 |
2.53 |
0.40 |
0.57 |
1.683 |
12.62 |
21.76 | |||
Other labor |
hour |
1.00 |
Apr |
10.0000 |
7.50 |
75.00 |
75.00 | ||||||||
Cult-fert 1R |
3 ft |
23 |
1.610 |
1.00 |
Apr |
5.93 |
2.66 |
0.57 |
0.81 |
1.771 |
13.28 |
23.24 | |||
Ammonium Nitrate 33% lb |
75.0000 |
0.13 |
9.75 |
9.75 | |||||||||||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
23 |
0.190 |
1.00 |
Apr |
0.70 |
0.31 |
0.26 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.57 |
3.12 | |||
Thiodan |
lb |
0.5000 |
8.00 |
4.00 |
4.00 | ||||||||||
Bravo |
pt |
1.5000 |
6.38 |
9.57 |
9.57 | ||||||||||
Cultivator 1R |
3 ft |
23 |
1.530 |
1.00 |
Apr |
5.63 |
2.53 |
0.40 |
0.57 |
1.683 |
12.62 |
21.76 | |||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
23 |
0.190 |
1.00 |
Apr |
0.70 |
0.31 |
0.26 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.57 |
3.12 | |||
Thiodan |
lb |
0.5000 |
8.00 |
4.00 |
4.00 | ||||||||||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
23 |
0.190 |
1.00 |
Apr |
0.70 |
0.31 |
0.26 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.57 |
3.12 | |||
Poast |
pt |
1.0000 |
12.56 |
12.56 |
12.56 | ||||||||||
Crop oil |
pt |
2.0000 |
0.78 |
1.56 |
1.56 | ||||||||||
Cultivator 1R |
3 ft |
23 |
1.530 |
1.00 |
May |
5.63 |
2.53 |
0.40 |
0.57 |
1.683 |
12.62 |
21.76 | |||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
23 |
0.190 |
1.00 |
May |
0.70 |
0.31 |
0.26 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.57 |
3.12 | |||
Sevin |
lb |
0.6000 |
4.40 |
2.64 |
2.64 | ||||||||||
Bravo |
pt |
1.5000 |
6.38 |
9.57 |
9.57 | ||||||||||
Other labor |
hour |
1.00 |
Jun |
10.0000 |
7.50 |
75.00 |
75.00 | ||||||||
Trailer utility |
10 ft |
23 |
1.000 |
5.00 |
Jul |
18.41 |
8.27 |
2.00 |
7.14 |
5.500 |
41.25 |
77.06 | |||
Harvest labor |
hour |
1.00 |
Jul |
40.0000 |
7.50 |
300.00 |
300.00 | ||||||||
Pickup truck |
½ ton |
1.000 |
5.00 |
Jul |
20.78 |
16.81 |
5.000 |
37.50 |
75.09 | ||||||
Shredder 1R |
5 ft |
23 |
0.740 |
1.00 |
Jul |
2.72 |
1.22 |
0.28 |
0.74 |
0.814 |
6.11 |
11.08 | |||
Disk 2R |
6 ft |
43 |
0.570 |
1.00 |
Jul |
2.89 |
1.46 |
0.38 |
0.54 |
0.627 |
4.70 |
9.97 | |||
TOTALS |
78.62 |
35.79 |
29.26 |
33.12 |
27.781 |
208.36 |
605.33 |
990.48 | |||||||
INTEREST ON OPERATING CAPITAL |
20.27 | ||||||||||||||
UNALLOCATED LABOR |
0.00 | ||||||||||||||
TOTAL SPECIFIED COST |
1010.75 |
H-54
More intriguing information
1. Learning-by-Exporting? Firm-Level Evidence for UK Manufacturing and Services Sectors2. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles
3. The name is absent
4. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11
5. The name is absent
6. On the job rotation problem
7. Discourse Patterns in First Language Use at Hcme and Second Language Learning at School: an Ethnographic Approach
8. Developmental Robots - A New Paradigm
9. The Clustering of Financial Services in London*
10. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis