Table 2: Scores on continuous AAI scales and reflective function scores
Mean (SD) |
Effect size | ||
AAI scales |
Autism |
Controls |
Autism vs. controls |
RF |
2.78 (1.75) |
3.90 (1.77) |
0.61* |
Coherence: transcript |
3.35 (1.73) |
4.65 (1.53) |
0.75* |
Idealising |
2.50 (1.69) |
2.21 (1.30) | |
Lack memory |
2.70 (2.66) |
3.13 (2.33) | |
Anger |
2.20 (1.56) |
2.00 (1.39) | |
Passivity |
3.10 (2.02) |
2.93 (1.65) | |
Derogation: parents |
1.60 (1.04) |
1.71 (0.98) | |
Derogation: attachment |
1.75 (1.12) |
2.40 (2.12) | |
Coherence of mind |
3.43 (1.74) |
4.60 (1.56) |
0.67* |
Unresolved: loss |
2.42 (1.98) |
3.61 (2.02) |
0.47* |
Unresolved: trauma |
2.65 (1.62) |
2.75 (2.44) |
* p < .05 difference between group means on Mann-Whitney U test
Effect sizes of differences between group means are only given where significant
Autism n = 20, controls n = 20
38
More intriguing information
1. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?2. The name is absent
3. The Role of Evidence in Establishing Trust in Repositories
4. The name is absent
5. PROFITABILITY OF ALFALFA HAY STORAGE USING PROBABILITIES: AN EXTENSION APPROACH
6. Fertility in Developing Countries
7. The name is absent
8. Examining the Regional Aspect of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries
9. Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?
10. AGRIBUSINESS EXECUTIVE EDUCATION AND KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE: NEW MECHANISMS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INVOLVING THE UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE FIRM STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC SECTOR