Table 2: Scores on continuous AAI scales and reflective function scores
|
Mean (SD) |
Effect size | ||
|
AAI scales |
Autism |
Controls |
Autism vs. controls |
|
RF |
2.78 (1.75) |
3.90 (1.77) |
0.61* |
|
Coherence: transcript |
3.35 (1.73) |
4.65 (1.53) |
0.75* |
|
Idealising |
2.50 (1.69) |
2.21 (1.30) | |
|
Lack memory |
2.70 (2.66) |
3.13 (2.33) | |
|
Anger |
2.20 (1.56) |
2.00 (1.39) | |
|
Passivity |
3.10 (2.02) |
2.93 (1.65) | |
|
Derogation: parents |
1.60 (1.04) |
1.71 (0.98) | |
|
Derogation: attachment |
1.75 (1.12) |
2.40 (2.12) | |
|
Coherence of mind |
3.43 (1.74) |
4.60 (1.56) |
0.67* |
|
Unresolved: loss |
2.42 (1.98) |
3.61 (2.02) |
0.47* |
|
Unresolved: trauma |
2.65 (1.62) |
2.75 (2.44) | |
* p < .05 difference between group means on Mann-Whitney U test
Effect sizes of differences between group means are only given where significant
Autism n = 20, controls n = 20
38
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Personal Income Tax Elasticity in Turkey: 1975-2005
4. The name is absent
5. THE USE OF EXTRANEOUS INFORMATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A POLICY SIMULATION MODEL
6. The name is absent
7. Estimation of marginal abatement costs for undesirable outputs in India's power generation sector: An output distance function approach.
8. CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM
9. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
10. Evidence-Based Professional Development of Science Teachers in Two Countries