Table 3: Participants’ state of mind scores for the parallel interview, and correlations
with AAI state of mind scores
|
Parallel interview scores |
Parallel mean (SD |
AAI mean (SD) |
Correlation |
|
Metacognitive monitoring |
1 |
2.78 (1.75)** |
NA |
|
Coherence of transcript |
5.23 (2.13) |
3.35 (1.73)* |
-.14 |
|
Idealising |
2.23 (1.96) |
2.50 (1.69) |
.27 |
|
Lack memory |
1.85 (1.91) |
2.70 (2.66) |
.71** |
|
Anger |
1.92 (1.38) |
2.20 (1.56) |
.79*** |
|
Passivity |
2.85 (2.08) |
3.10 (2.02) |
.65* |
|
Derogation |
1 |
1.60 (1.04)* |
NA |
|
Coherence of mind |
5.38 (2.26) |
3.43 (1.74)* |
-.04 |
All participants scored 1 on “metacognitive monitoring” and “derogation” in the
parallel interview.
NA: could not be calculated, *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001
Correlations are Spearman’s rho. Highlighted AAI means are significantly different from
parallel interview means (Wilcoxon signed ranks test).
39
More intriguing information
1. Trade Openness and Volatility2. Prizes and Patents: Using Market Signals to Provide Incentives for Innovations
3. TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION OF FAN-BEAM PROJECTIONS WITH EQUIDISTANT DETECTORS USING PARTIALLY CONNECTED NEURAL NETWORKS
4. National urban policy responses in the European Union: Towards a European urban policy?
5. ROBUST CLASSIFICATION WITH CONTEXT-SENSITIVE FEATURES
6. EU enlargement and environmental policy
7. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters
8. Psychological Aspects of Market Crashes
9. Name Strategy: Its Existence and Implications
10. Experimental Evidence of Risk Aversion in Consumer Markets: The Case of Beef Tenderness