Table 3: Participants’ state of mind scores for the parallel interview, and correlations
with AAI state of mind scores
|
Parallel interview scores |
Parallel mean (SD |
AAI mean (SD) |
Correlation |
|
Metacognitive monitoring |
1 |
2.78 (1.75)** |
NA |
|
Coherence of transcript |
5.23 (2.13) |
3.35 (1.73)* |
-.14 |
|
Idealising |
2.23 (1.96) |
2.50 (1.69) |
.27 |
|
Lack memory |
1.85 (1.91) |
2.70 (2.66) |
.71** |
|
Anger |
1.92 (1.38) |
2.20 (1.56) |
.79*** |
|
Passivity |
2.85 (2.08) |
3.10 (2.02) |
.65* |
|
Derogation |
1 |
1.60 (1.04)* |
NA |
|
Coherence of mind |
5.38 (2.26) |
3.43 (1.74)* |
-.04 |
All participants scored 1 on “metacognitive monitoring” and “derogation” in the
parallel interview.
NA: could not be calculated, *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001
Correlations are Spearman’s rho. Highlighted AAI means are significantly different from
parallel interview means (Wilcoxon signed ranks test).
39
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
5. THE INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK FOR U.S. TOBACCO
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Life is an Adventure! An agent-based reconciliation of narrative and scientific worldviews
10. Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region