Table 5: Correlations between participants’ coherence and reflective function scores and
other variables of interest
|
Variables |
Coherence of transcript |
Coherence of mind |
Reflective function |
|
ADOS communication |
-.48, p = .03* |
-.36, p = .13 |
-.23, p = .34 |
|
ADOS RSI |
-.31, p = .18 |
-.16, p = .50 |
-.29, p = .22 |
|
Verbal IQ |
.36, p = .11 |
.30, p = .21 |
.25, p = .28 |
|
Performance IQ |
.25, p = .30 |
.19, p = .43 |
.18, p = .44 |
|
Full-scale IQ |
.41, p = .08 |
.25, p = .29 |
.23, p = .32 |
|
Strange stories mental |
.37, p = .14 |
.21, p = .42 |
.26, p = .32 |
|
Eyes task |
.29, p = .21 |
.27, p = .25 |
.38, p = .10 |
RSI: reciprocal social interaction
*p < .05
47
More intriguing information
1. Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring and Investment in Pollution Abatement2. O funcionalismo de Sellars: uma pesquisa histδrica
3. The name is absent
4. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
5. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin
6. Constrained School Choice
7. Determinants of Household Health Expenditure: Case of Urban Orissa
8. The name is absent
9. Valuing Farm Financial Information
10. The name is absent