Table 2. Results of Logit Models: WTP to Avoid Visibility Loss and WTA
Compensation for Loss of Visibility
|
Model 1: Dependent Variable = WTP |
Model 2: Dependent Variable = WTA | |
|
Variable |
Coefficient |
Coefficient |
|
(Standard Error) |
(Standard Error) | |
|
Constant |
-7.38847*** |
9.84487*** |
|
(2.50592) |
(3.61821) | |
|
INCOME |
0.02213*** |
0.00724 |
|
(0.00682) |
(0.00493) | |
|
FVISIT |
0.34000 |
-1.24826 |
|
(0.40970) |
(0.34831) | |
|
BID |
-0.04604*** |
-0.00988 |
|
(0.1347) |
(0.01135) | |
|
VISLOSS |
0.04933** |
-0.08221** |
|
(0.01872) |
(0.02808) | |
|
N |
172 |
248 |
|
Chi-Squared |
33.04469 (4 d.f.) |
23.87060 (4 d.f.) |
|
% of Correct Predictions |
70.3 |
80.6 |
|
*** significant at .01 level ** significant at .05 level * significant at .10 level |
15
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The Complexity Era in Economics
4. How Offshoring Can Affect the Industries’ Skill Composition
5. Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs
6. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
7. The quick and the dead: when reaction beats intention
8. Three Strikes and You.re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis
9. The name is absent
10. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources