References
Adamowicz, W. L., V. Bhardwaj, and B. Macnab, 1993. Experiments on the Difference
between Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept, Land Economics 69, No. 4, 416-427.
Ando, A. and K. Palmer. 1998. “On the Way to Retail Competition.” Resources. 132: 11-14.
Arrow, K. and A. Fisher. 1974. “Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty, and Irreversibility.”
Quarterly Journal of Economics. 88(1): 312-319.
Arrow, K.J., R. Solow, E. Leamer, P. Portney, R. Radner, and H. Schuman. Report of the
NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register. 58: 4601-4614.
Brookshire, Thayer, Schulze and D’Arge. 1982. “Valuing Public Goods: A Comparison of
Survey and Hedonic Approaches,” American Economic Review Vol 72:165-177.
Burtraw, D., A. Krupnick, and K. Palmer. 1996. “Air Quality and Electricity: What
Competition May Mean.” Resource. 123: 6-8.
Carson, R. 2002. Contingent Valuation: a comprehensive bibliography and history. Williston,
VT., Edward Elgar, in press.
Chestnut, L. and R. Rowe. 1990. “Economic Valuation of Changes in Visibility: A State of the
Science Assessment for NAPAP.” In Acidic Deposition: State of Science and Technology,
Report 27, Washington, D.C. NAPAP.
Coursey D., J. Hovis, and W. Schulze, The Disparity Between Willingness to Pay and
Willingness to Accept Measures of Value, Quarterly Journal of Economics 102, No. 3, 1987,
679-690.
Crocker, Thomas and Jason Shogren. 1991. “Ex-Ante Valuation of Atmospheric Visibility.”
Applied Economics. Vol. 23, 143-151.
Goldar, B. and S. Misra. 2001. “Valuation of Environmental Goods: Correcting for Bias in
Contingent Valuation Studies Based on Willingness-to-Accept. American Journal of
Agricultural Economics. 83[1]: 150-156.
Hanemann, W. Michael, Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They
Differ? American Economic Review 81, No. 3, 1991, 635-647.
Harper, W. 2000. “A Comparison of Direct Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities: A
Case Study of the White Mountain National Forest.” (Ph.D. dissertation, University of New
Hampshire).
17