MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS



5. Conclusions

While many researchers have developed and applied methods for estimating the tech-
nical efficiency of firms (or other units of observations), less effort has been expended on
examining the precision of the estimated efficiency scores and the resulting rankings of the
firms studied. Horrace and Schmidt (2000) introduced two multiple comparison techniques
(MCC and MCB) based on sampling theory statistics to this literature. In this paper, we
add a Bayesian approach to the toolkit for measuring the precision of efficiency estimates
and the ability to such estimates to accurately differentiate between the units being ranked.

After presenting the details of how to implement the Bayesian Multiple Compari-
son (BMC) approach, we presented an application to a panel of 43 U.S. electric utilities.
Bayesian estimation of a distance function yields a set of technical efficiency estimates con-
sistent with economic theory that provide an empirical ranking of the 43 firms. Application
of the BMC approach then allows us to analyze which firms can truly be differentiated
from which others at any desired level of probability. That is, we can make statements such
as “there is an 99.6% probability that firm 31 is more efficient than all the firms in group
4” and “there is a 54.7% probability that all the firms in group 1 are more efficient than
all the firms in group 3.” The MCB approach of Horrace and Schmidt was also applied to
the same technical efficiency estimates and provided some contrasting results in terms of
the ability to differentiate firms on the basis of their TE scores.

We believe that the Bayesian results provide more flexibility in terms of multiple
comparisons that are possible, particularly for those researchers who are not statistical
experts. Using the procedure outlined in this paper, it is straightforward to compute the
probability of any firm or group of firms being more efficient than any other firm or group
of firms. This probability provides an exact measure of the ability to rank the groups/firms

26



More intriguing information

1. The Macroeconomic Determinants of Volatility in Precious Metals Markets
2. The name is absent
3. DISCUSSION: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS OF EMERGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
4. Reform of the EU Sugar Regime: Impacts on Sugar Production in Ireland
5. Biologically inspired distributed machine cognition: a new formal approach to hyperparallel computation
6. Nach der Einführung von Arbeitslosengeld II: deutlich mehr Verlierer als Gewinner unter den Hilfeempfängern
7. The name is absent
8. Consumer Networks and Firm Reputation: A First Experimental Investigation
9. How to do things without words: Infants, utterance-activity and distributed cognition.
10. Initial Public Offerings and Venture Capital in Germany
11. THE ECONOMICS OF COMPETITION IN HEALTH INSURANCE- THE IRISH CASE STUDY.
12. Who’s afraid of critical race theory in education? a reply to Mike Cole’s ‘The color-line and the class struggle’
13. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective
14. CAPACITAÇÃO GERENCIAL DE AGRICULTORES FAMILIARES: UMA PROPOSTA METODOLÓGICA DE EXTENSÃO RURAL
15. The name is absent
16. Optimal Vehicle Size, Haulage Length, and the Structure of Transport Costs
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. RETAIL SALES: DO THEY MEAN REDUCED EXPENDITURES? GERMAN GROCERY EVIDENCE
20. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11