MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS



Appendix: Pseudo Code for Step 1 of the Gibbs Sampler

a. First, generate a Wishart random variable A(i) = [Σ(i) ]-1 ~ W (S-1, ν ).

i. Let LL = S-1, where L is a lower triangular matrix from the Cholesky de-
composition of S
-1. We obtain S-1 as the inverse of the estimated variance-
covariance matrix of the error terms.

ii. Assume that Q ~ W (I, ν ). Then LQL ~ W (LL, ν ) = W (S-1, ν )

iii. Now from Anderson (1984) UU ' = Q ~ W (I, ν ), where U is lower triangular,
all u
ij are independent, uij~ N(0,1), i > j, and u2i ~ χ2i + 1) random
variable, which implies that
LUU 'L' ~ W (S-1, ν ). Thus, we draw uij values
and form Q
(i) = U(i)U(i) .

iv. Now use L and Q(i) compute LQ(i)L'∕ν = A(i).

b. Compute Σ(i) = [A(i)]-1 , which is an inverse-Wishart random variable.

28



More intriguing information

1. Review of “The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas”
2. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment
3. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
4. Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network To Detect Hyperthermic Seizures In Rats
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. FDI Implications of Recent European Court of Justice Decision on Corporation Tax Matters
8. The name is absent
9. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules
10. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals