ASSESSMENT OF MARKET RISK IN HOG PRODUCTION USING VALUE-AT-RISK AND EXTREME VALUE THEORY



Figure 2:    QQ-plots for farrows, hogs, finishing margin (1 week)

a) farrow prices (1-week-differences)

b) hog prices (1-week-differences)

c) hog finishing margin (1-week-differences)

Euro/hog

Figure 2 indicates a positive excess for the weekly changes of farrow prices and hog prices whereas the
interpretation of the QQ-plot of the feeding margin is less clear. The realization of a Kolmogorov-Smirnoff
goodness of fit test supports the conjecture that the analyzed series are not normally distributed. The null hypothesis
is rejected on a 5% level for all three distributions. Finally, the Jarque-Bera-test, which summarizes deviations from
the normal distribution with respect to skewness and kurtosis, provides further evidence about the non-normality of
the distribution. The critical value of the test statistic is 9.2 on a 1% level of significance and is exceeded by the
corresponding empirical values of the farrow prices (55.4), the pig prices (55.1) and the feeding margin (23.5). Thus
the test results provide evidence that all distributions are fat tailed and justify to estimate an extreme value
distribution.

13



More intriguing information

1. Quality practices, priorities and performance: an international study
2. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification
3. Surveying the welfare state: challenges, policy development and causes of resilience
4. The Trade Effects of MERCOSUR and The Andean Community on U.S. Cotton Exports to CBI countries
5. The name is absent
6. Beyond Networks? A brief response to ‘Which networks matter in education governance?’
7. The Effects of Reforming the Chinese Dual-Track Price System
8. Quelles politiques de développement durable au Mali et à Madagascar ?
9. Managing Human Resources in Higher Education: The Implications of a Diversifying Workforce
10. Inflation Targeting and Nonlinear Policy Rules: The Case of Asymmetric Preferences (new title: The Fed's monetary policy rule and U.S. inflation: The case of asymmetric preferences)