Tab. 3: Estimation results for the relationship between the retail price index (per
capita expenditures) and the number of sales
|
Endogenous |
Price Index SSM |
Price Index BSM |
Price Index CSM |
Price Index DC | ||||
|
dPRT_1 |
-0,40 |
-4,22 |
-0,53 |
-7,31 |
-0,68 |
-10,50 |
-0,51 |
-6,38 |
|
dPRT_2 |
-0,43 |
-4,84 |
-0,45 |
-6,24 |
-0,62 |
-8,86 |
-0,30 |
-3,85 |
|
dPRT_3 |
-0,15 |
-1,97 |
-0,28 |
-4,35 |
-0,44 |
-6,71 |
-0,34 |
-4,70 |
|
dPRT_4 |
0,01 |
0,16 |
-0,07 |
-1,55 |
-0,11 |
-2,40 |
-0,14 |
-2,59 |
|
Constant |
1087,11 |
4,56 |
560,65 |
3,27 |
164,31 |
1,69 |
696,70 |
4,10 |
|
PRT_1 |
-0,47 |
-4,95 |
-0,25 |
-4,26 |
-0,18 |
-3,99 |
-0,39 |
-4,99 |
|
PWS_1 |
0,32 |
4,17 |
0,22 |
4,23 |
0,26 |
3,63 |
0,27 |
3,57 |
|
dPWS |
0,22 |
0,75 |
-0,14 |
-0,76 |
0,17 |
0,96 |
-0,02 |
-0,06 |
|
dPWS_1 |
-0,53 |
-1,68 |
-0,19 |
-0,94 |
-0,25 |
-1,22 |
0,10 |
0,29 |
|
dPWS_2 |
0,15 |
0,48 |
-0,23 |
-1,16 |
0,06 |
0,30 |
-0,26 |
-0,73 |
|
dPWS_3 |
-0,75 |
-2,41 |
0,11 |
0,56 |
0,03 |
0,16 |
-0,35 |
-0,97 |
|
dPWS_4 |
0,41 |
1,33 |
-0,01 |
-0,07 |
0,05 |
0,26 |
-0,31 |
-0,88 |
|
SM |
-306,58 |
-11,60 |
-359,72 |
-14,20 |
-323,33 |
-12,50 |
-168,77 |
-10,00 |
|
SM_1 |
105,09 |
3,19 |
96,79 |
2,90 |
89,93 |
2,80 |
12,44 |
0,63 |
|
SM_2 |
27,69 |
0,84 |
39,93 |
1,17 |
37,52 |
1,17 |
5,90 |
0,30 |
|
SM_3 |
60,65 |
1,85 |
50,15 |
1,48 |
68,61 |
2,14 |
-18,72 |
-0,94 |
|
SM_4 |
4,78 |
0,15 |
49,11 |
1,43 |
94,20 |
2,93 |
28,56 |
1,46 |
|
SF&V |
-35,95 |
-1,92 |
-42,25 |
-2,13 |
-1,17 |
-0,05 |
-11,74 |
-0,97 |
|
SF&V_1 |
36,99 |
1,84 |
-12,43 |
-0,61 |
-30,30 |
-1,27 |
-10,15 |
-0,82 |
|
SF&V_2 |
-5,58 |
-0,28 |
10,61 |
0,51 |
41,21 |
1,71 |
-16,96 |
-1,38 |
|
SF&V_3 |
-2,61 |
-0,13 |
-18,53 |
-0,90 |
-31,31 |
-1,30 |
13,17 |
1,09 |
|
SF&V_4 |
6,66 |
0,35 |
37,18 |
1,91 |
31,73 |
1,44 |
6,88 |
0,57 |
|
R^2 |
0,73 |
- |
0,71 |
- |
0,73 |
- |
0,64 |
- |
|
DW |
2,01 |
- |
1,99 |
- |
2,08 |
- |
2,05 |
- |
|
AR2: F(2,254)= |
0,65 |
[0,52] |
1,81 |
[0,17] |
2,95 |
[0,05] |
2,33 |
[0,10] |
|
ARCH1: F(1,254)= |
2,11 |
[0,15] |
0,00 |
[0,99] |
1,00 |
[0,32] |
0,17 |
[0,68] |
|
Normality: Chi^2(2)= |
2,40 |
[0,30] |
5,36 |
[0,07] |
9,71 |
[0,01]** |
31,93 |
[0,00]** |
|
Heterosk.: F(53,202)= |
0,84 |
[0,77] |
0,90 |
[0,67] |
0,77 |
[0,87] |
1,08 |
[0,35] |
|
Reset: F(1,255)= |
0,57 |
[0,45] |
2,10 |
[0,15] |
0,80 |
[0,37] |
0,07 |
[0,79] |
|
ΣSM=0: Chi^2(1)= |
2,86 |
[0,09] |
6,17 |
[0,01]* |
0,47 |
[0,50] |
15,43 |
[0,00]** |
|
ΣSF&V=0: Chi^2(1)= |
0,00 |
[0,99] |
0,94 |
[0,33] |
0,19 |
[0,66] |
1,12 |
[0,29] |
Legend: Calculations are run with Ox 3.0 and PcGive 10.0 (Doornik and Hendry, 2001). Estimates for the seasonal
components are not documented here.
Source: Data by ZMP, 2001.
11
More intriguing information
1. WP 92 - An overview of women's work and employment in Azerbaijan2. Types of Cost in Inductive Concept Learning
3. Globalization, Divergence and Stagnation
4. Education Responses to Climate Change and Quality: Two Parts of the Same Agenda?
5. The name is absent
6. Investment in Next Generation Networks and the Role of Regulation: A Real Option Approach
7. Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. REVITALIZING FAMILY FARM AGRICULTURE