Tab. 3: Estimation results for the relationship between the retail price index (per
capita expenditures) and the number of sales
Endogenous |
Price Index SSM |
Price Index BSM |
Price Index CSM |
Price Index DC | ||||
dPRT_1 |
-0,40 |
-4,22 |
-0,53 |
-7,31 |
-0,68 |
-10,50 |
-0,51 |
-6,38 |
dPRT_2 |
-0,43 |
-4,84 |
-0,45 |
-6,24 |
-0,62 |
-8,86 |
-0,30 |
-3,85 |
dPRT_3 |
-0,15 |
-1,97 |
-0,28 |
-4,35 |
-0,44 |
-6,71 |
-0,34 |
-4,70 |
dPRT_4 |
0,01 |
0,16 |
-0,07 |
-1,55 |
-0,11 |
-2,40 |
-0,14 |
-2,59 |
Constant |
1087,11 |
4,56 |
560,65 |
3,27 |
164,31 |
1,69 |
696,70 |
4,10 |
PRT_1 |
-0,47 |
-4,95 |
-0,25 |
-4,26 |
-0,18 |
-3,99 |
-0,39 |
-4,99 |
PWS_1 |
0,32 |
4,17 |
0,22 |
4,23 |
0,26 |
3,63 |
0,27 |
3,57 |
dPWS |
0,22 |
0,75 |
-0,14 |
-0,76 |
0,17 |
0,96 |
-0,02 |
-0,06 |
dPWS_1 |
-0,53 |
-1,68 |
-0,19 |
-0,94 |
-0,25 |
-1,22 |
0,10 |
0,29 |
dPWS_2 |
0,15 |
0,48 |
-0,23 |
-1,16 |
0,06 |
0,30 |
-0,26 |
-0,73 |
dPWS_3 |
-0,75 |
-2,41 |
0,11 |
0,56 |
0,03 |
0,16 |
-0,35 |
-0,97 |
dPWS_4 |
0,41 |
1,33 |
-0,01 |
-0,07 |
0,05 |
0,26 |
-0,31 |
-0,88 |
SM |
-306,58 |
-11,60 |
-359,72 |
-14,20 |
-323,33 |
-12,50 |
-168,77 |
-10,00 |
SM_1 |
105,09 |
3,19 |
96,79 |
2,90 |
89,93 |
2,80 |
12,44 |
0,63 |
SM_2 |
27,69 |
0,84 |
39,93 |
1,17 |
37,52 |
1,17 |
5,90 |
0,30 |
SM_3 |
60,65 |
1,85 |
50,15 |
1,48 |
68,61 |
2,14 |
-18,72 |
-0,94 |
SM_4 |
4,78 |
0,15 |
49,11 |
1,43 |
94,20 |
2,93 |
28,56 |
1,46 |
SF&V |
-35,95 |
-1,92 |
-42,25 |
-2,13 |
-1,17 |
-0,05 |
-11,74 |
-0,97 |
SF&V_1 |
36,99 |
1,84 |
-12,43 |
-0,61 |
-30,30 |
-1,27 |
-10,15 |
-0,82 |
SF&V_2 |
-5,58 |
-0,28 |
10,61 |
0,51 |
41,21 |
1,71 |
-16,96 |
-1,38 |
SF&V_3 |
-2,61 |
-0,13 |
-18,53 |
-0,90 |
-31,31 |
-1,30 |
13,17 |
1,09 |
SF&V_4 |
6,66 |
0,35 |
37,18 |
1,91 |
31,73 |
1,44 |
6,88 |
0,57 |
R^2 |
0,73 |
- |
0,71 |
- |
0,73 |
- |
0,64 |
- |
DW |
2,01 |
- |
1,99 |
- |
2,08 |
- |
2,05 |
- |
AR2: F(2,254)= |
0,65 |
[0,52] |
1,81 |
[0,17] |
2,95 |
[0,05] |
2,33 |
[0,10] |
ARCH1: F(1,254)= |
2,11 |
[0,15] |
0,00 |
[0,99] |
1,00 |
[0,32] |
0,17 |
[0,68] |
Normality: Chi^2(2)= |
2,40 |
[0,30] |
5,36 |
[0,07] |
9,71 |
[0,01]** |
31,93 |
[0,00]** |
Heterosk.: F(53,202)= |
0,84 |
[0,77] |
0,90 |
[0,67] |
0,77 |
[0,87] |
1,08 |
[0,35] |
Reset: F(1,255)= |
0,57 |
[0,45] |
2,10 |
[0,15] |
0,80 |
[0,37] |
0,07 |
[0,79] |
ΣSM=0: Chi^2(1)= |
2,86 |
[0,09] |
6,17 |
[0,01]* |
0,47 |
[0,50] |
15,43 |
[0,00]** |
ΣSF&V=0: Chi^2(1)= |
0,00 |
[0,99] |
0,94 |
[0,33] |
0,19 |
[0,66] |
1,12 |
[0,29] |
Legend: Calculations are run with Ox 3.0 and PcGive 10.0 (Doornik and Hendry, 2001). Estimates for the seasonal
components are not documented here.
Source: Data by ZMP, 2001.
11
More intriguing information
1. Gender and aquaculture: sharing the benefits equitably2. The name is absent
3. Clinical Teaching and OSCE in Pediatrics
4. The Role of Trait Emotional Intelligence (El) in the Workplace.
5. The name is absent
6. ¿Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños)? Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua.
7. STIMULATING COOPERATION AMONG FARMERS IN A POST-SOCIALIST ECONOMY: LESSONS FROM A PUBLIC-PRIVATE MARKETING PARTNERSHIP IN POLAND
8. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation
9. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
10. Computational Experiments with the Fuzzy Love and Romance