The name is absent



Stata Technical Bulletin

27


. list id activity age birth year period

id

activity

age

birth

year

period

1.

1

nonactiv

22

54

76

-90

2.

1

selfemp

27

54

81

-90

3.

1

selfemp

39

54

90

-90

4.

1

selfemp

39

54

91

[90-91

ε.

1

selfemp

39

54

93

[91-

6.

2

nonactiv

19

74

90

-90

7.

2

nonactiv

19

74

91

[90-91

S.

2

nonactiv

19

74

93

[91-

9.

3

nonactiv

19

65

84

-90

10.

3

selfemp

22

65

87

-90

11.

3

waged

28

65

90

-90

12.

3

waged

28

65

91

[90-91

13.

3

waged

28

65

93

[91-

14.

4

nonactiv

7

70

77

-90

ιε.

4

nonactiv

20

70

90

-90

16.

4

selfemp

23

70

91

[90-91

17.

4

selfemp

23

70

93

[91-

18.

ε

nonactiv

4

68

72

-90

19.

ε

waged

11

68

79

-90

20.

ε

nonactiv

22

68

90

-90

21.

ε

waged

26

68

91

[90-91

22.

ε

waged

26

68

93

[91-

23.

6

nonactiv

12

66

78

-90

24.

6

nonactiv

24

66

90

-90

28.

6

waged

27

66

91

[90-91

26.

6

waged

27

66

93

[91-

27.

7

nonactiv

24

69

90

-90

28.

7

nonactiv

24

69

91

[90-91

29.

7

nonactiv

24

69

93

[91-

30.

8

nonactiv

16

54

70

-90

31.

8

nonactiv

39

54

90

-90

32.

8

nonactiv

39

54

91

[90-91

33.

8

nonactiv

39

54

93

[91-

Since every individual is observed as late as 1993 and none is observed in both 1990 and 1991, slicing the data on the
1990-91 interval affects the observations for each individual. For instance, slice adds two observations for individual ‘1’, one
for 1990, and one for 1991. The values of all the variables except year are copied down from the observation where year==93,
the first observation following the 1990-91 interval. As a consequence, the age is incorrect in the added observations. This
problem is easily corrected.

. replace age = year - birth
(13 real changes made)

Now we can examine activity in 1991 (period==l):

. tabulate activity sex if period==l
I Sex

Activityl

Male

Female I

Total

nonactiV I

0

3 I

3

waged I

1

2 I

3

selfemp I

2

0 I

2

Total I

3

5 I

8

Apart from descriptive analysis, the slice command is most useful in Cox regression, when we use time-varying regressors
to test the effect of passing through different calendar periods or age groups. For example, we can slice the time into three
periods: from the earliest year through 1980, from 1981 through 1990, and from 1991 until the time at survey (1993):

. use example, clear
. slice year, tvid(id) interval(80,90) saving(new) generate(period)

-80    + 8

[80-90    + 5

[90-     --------

13 records added to 20

Note that age has to be corrected again, before running the regression:

. replace age = year - birth
(13 real changes made)



More intriguing information

1. Educational Inequalities Among School Leavers in Ireland 1979-1994
2. Determinants of U.S. Textile and Apparel Import Trade
3. Determinants of Household Health Expenditure: Case of Urban Orissa
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Wage mobility, Job mobility and Spatial mobility in the Portuguese economy
7. The name is absent
8. The Global Dimension to Fiscal Sustainability
9. The name is absent
10. Income Mobility of Owners of Small Businesses when Boundaries between Occupations are Vague
11. The name is absent
12. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?
13. The Prohibition of the Proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: How much Economics in German Merger Control?
14. What should educational research do, and how should it do it? A response to “Will a clinical approach make educational research more relevant to practice” by Jacquelien Bulterman-Bos
15. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA
16. Experimental Evidence of Risk Aversion in Consumer Markets: The Case of Beef Tenderness
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. Plasmid-Encoded Multidrug Resistance of Salmonella typhi and some Enteric Bacteria in and around Kolkata, India: A Preliminary Study
20. The name is absent