26
Stata Technical Bulletin
STB-22
id |
activity |
age |
birth |
year |
grage | |
1. |
1 |
nonactiv |
22 |
54 |
76 |
-25 |
2. |
1 |
selfemp |
26 |
54 |
81 |
-25 |
3. |
1 |
selfemp |
26 |
54 |
81 |
[25-26 |
4. |
1 |
selfemp |
27 |
54 |
81 |
[26- |
ε. |
1 |
selfemp |
39 |
54 |
93 |
[26- |
6. |
2 |
nonactiv |
19 |
74 |
93 |
-25 |
7. |
3 |
nonactiv |
19 |
65 |
84 |
-25 |
8. |
3 |
selfemp |
22 |
65 |
87 |
-25 |
9. |
3 |
waged |
26 |
65 |
93 |
-25 |
10. |
3 |
waged |
26 |
65 |
93 |
[25-26 |
11. |
3 |
waged |
28 |
65 |
93 |
[26- |
12. |
4 |
nonactiv |
7 |
70 |
77 |
-25 |
13. |
4 |
nonactiv |
20 |
70 |
90 |
-25 |
14. |
4 |
selfemp |
23 |
70 |
93 |
-25 |
ιε. |
ε |
nonactiv |
4 |
68 |
72 |
-25 |
16. |
ε |
waged |
11 |
68 |
79 |
-25 |
17. |
ε |
nonactiv |
22 |
68 |
90 |
-25 |
18. |
ε |
waged |
26 |
68 |
93 |
-25 |
19. |
6 |
nonactiv |
12 |
66 |
78 |
-25 |
20. |
6 |
nonactiv |
24 |
66 |
90 |
-25 |
21. |
6 |
waged |
26 |
66 |
93 |
-25 |
22. |
6 |
waged |
26 |
66 |
93 |
[25-26 |
23. |
6 |
waged |
27 |
66 |
93 |
[26- |
24. |
7 |
nonactiv |
24 |
69 |
93 |
-25 |
25. |
8 |
nonactiv |
16 |
54 |
70 |
-25 |
26. |
8 |
nonactiv |
26 |
54 |
93 |
-25 |
27. |
8 |
nonactiv |
26 |
54 |
93 |
[25-26 |
28. |
8 |
nonactiv |
39 |
54 |
93 |
[26- |
. tabulate activity sex if grage==l
I Sex
Activityl |
Male |
Female I |
Total |
— | |||
nonactiV I |
0 |
1 I |
1 |
waged I |
0 |
2 I |
2 |
selfemp I |
1 |
0 I |
1 |
— | |||
Total I |
1 |
3 I |
4 |
Suppose that we are interested in studying the employment situation at a particular date, say 1991:
. use example, clear
. list id activity age birth year
id |
activity |
age |
birth |
year | |
1. |
1 |
nonactiv |
22 |
54 |
76 |
2. |
1 |
selfemp |
27 |
54 |
81 |
3. |
1 |
selfemp |
39 |
54 |
93 |
4. |
2 |
nonactiv |
19 |
74 |
93 |
5. |
3 |
nonactiv |
19 |
65 |
84 |
6. |
3 |
selfemp |
22 |
65 |
87 |
7. |
3 |
waged |
28 |
65 |
93 |
8. |
4 |
nonactiv |
7 |
70 |
77 |
9. |
4 |
nonactiv |
20 |
70 |
90 |
10. |
4 |
selfemp |
23 |
70 |
93 |
11. |
5 |
nonactiv |
4 |
68 |
72 |
12. |
5 |
waged |
11 |
68 |
79 |
13. |
5 |
nonactiv |
22 |
68 |
90 |
14. |
5 |
waged |
25 |
68 |
93 |
15. |
6 |
nonactiv |
12 |
66 |
78 |
16. |
6 |
nonactiv |
24 |
66 |
90 |
17. |
6 |
waged |
27 |
66 |
93 |
18. |
7 |
nonactiv |
24 |
69 |
93 |
19. |
8 |
nonactiv |
16 |
54 |
70 |
20. |
8 |
nonactiv |
39 |
54 |
93 |
. slice year, tvid(id) interval(90,91) saving(new91, replace) generate(period)
-90 + ε
[90-91 + 8
[91- --------
13 records added to 20
Now it is straightforward to analyze the job status
of the four individuals in this sample who reached the age of 26 during
the survey period.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Should Local Public Employment Services be Merged with the Local Social Benefit Administrations?
3. The name is absent
4. Quelles politiques de développement durable au Mali et à Madagascar ?
5. Analyzing the Agricultural Trade Impacts of the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement
6. The name is absent
7. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
8. Who’s afraid of critical race theory in education? a reply to Mike Cole’s ‘The color-line and the class struggle’
9. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
10. A Critical Examination of the Beliefs about Learning a Foreign Language at Primary School