Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA



226


Journal of Applied Economics

Table 1. Description of time series variables

Variable Description

CPAF Cost plus award fee contracts (percentage of the total value of contracts awarded
by NASA)

CPFF Cost plus fixed fee contracts (percentage of the total value of contracts awarded
by NASA)

FFP Firm fixed price contracts (percentage of the total value of contracts awarded by
NASA)

INC Incentive contracts (percentage of the total value of contracts awarded by NASA)
NASAc Value of NASA competitive contracts as a percentage of the total value awarded;
NASAnc Value of NASA non-competitive contracts as a percentage of the total value
awarded.

NASA Contracted value to the top 10 firms as a percentage of the total appropriations
top10 made by NASA

SENASA Space appropriations made by NASA at constant 1999 prices

Note: the inclusion of the letter “L” prior to all variables denotes the log of the respective time
series (i.e., LCPAF: log of CPAF). All figures are annual.

Figure 1. Competition in NASA contracts as a percentage
of total contracts awarded


Note: NASAc: the value of the NASA competitive contracts as a percentage of the total
value awarded; NASAnc: the value of the NASA non-competitive contracts as a percentage
of the total value awarded. Data sources: NASA (1983) to (2004a).



More intriguing information

1. Mean Variance Optimization of Non-Linear Systems and Worst-case Analysis
2. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence
3. Revisiting The Bell Curve Debate Regarding the Effects of Cognitive Ability on Wages
4. Multifunctionality of Agriculture: An Inquiry Into the Complementarity Between Landscape Preservation and Food Security
5. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
6. Credit Market Competition and Capital Regulation
7. El Mercosur y la integración económica global
8. The name is absent
9. Modelling Transport in an Interregional General Equilibrium Model with Externalities
10. Crime as a Social Cost of Poverty and Inequality: A Review Focusing on Developing Countries