19
such that
Example 6. We are given
Then
such that
|
1 0 | ||
|
A = |
0 1 | |
|
-1 -1 | ||
|
3 2 | ||
|
A = |
1 -1 | |
|
-3 -1 | ||
|
0 1 | ||
|
U = | ||
|
1 —2 | ||
|
2 -1 | ||
|
A = |
-1 3 | |
|
-1 -1 |
Observe that this example is taken from Examples 1 and 3. The matrix A corre-
sponds to Example 1 and the matrix A to Example 3. See Figure 3 for Example
3 where there are three completely labeled simplices of type I after having been
transformed. In this case there is no completely labeled simplex of type II. The
reader should compare Figure 1 with Figure 3.
Example 7. We are given
2 -1
3 1
-3 0
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Non-farm businesses local economic integration level: the case of six Portuguese small and medium-sized Markettowns• - a sector approach
3. The name is absent
4. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Income Mobility of Owners of Small Businesses when Boundaries between Occupations are Vague
8. The name is absent
9. PROPOSED IMMIGRATION POLICY REFORM & FARM LABOR MARKET OUTCOMES
10. The name is absent