The name is absent



21

Example 9. We are given

-1

-1

-1

3

1

1

A =

1

3

1

1

1

3

Then

0

1

0

U =

0

0

1

-1

-1

-1

such that

1

0

0

-1

2

0

À =

-1

0

2

-3

—2

—2

Now let us give a proof of Theorem 2.2. We are given a polytope which has the
standard form. Since
P contains no integral point, the algorithm terminates with
a completely labeled simplex of type 77, say, σ1(⅛1,π), within a finite number of
steps. Suppose to the contrary that there is another completely labeled simplex of
tpye 77, say, σ2(y1,
p). Without loss of generality we may assume that π is equal to
(1,..., n),
l(xt^) = i for any i ∈ .V. and хг = yl for all i ʌ except for some index k,
1 < к < n -
- 1. It implies that l(xt^) = l(yt) = i for all i N. We have to consider
the following cases:

(1). If к = 1, then /∕l = xn+1 ⅛ ¢(1). Since l(xn+1~) = n ⅛ 1, we have

<P+x" + ' - ^n+ι > alχn+1 - bt,l = 1, ,n.



More intriguing information

1. IMPROVING THE UNIVERSITY'S PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Skill and work experience in the European knowledge economy
5. Prizes and Patents: Using Market Signals to Provide Incentives for Innovations
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Competition In or For the Field: Which is Better
9. Evolutionary Clustering in Indonesian Ethnic Textile Motifs
10. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA