The name is absent



21

Example 9. We are given

-1

-1

-1

3

1

1

A =

1

3

1

1

1

3

Then

0

1

0

U =

0

0

1

-1

-1

-1

such that

1

0

0

-1

2

0

À =

-1

0

2

-3

—2

—2

Now let us give a proof of Theorem 2.2. We are given a polytope which has the
standard form. Since
P contains no integral point, the algorithm terminates with
a completely labeled simplex of type 77, say, σ1(⅛1,π), within a finite number of
steps. Suppose to the contrary that there is another completely labeled simplex of
tpye 77, say, σ2(y1,
p). Without loss of generality we may assume that π is equal to
(1,..., n),
l(xt^) = i for any i ∈ .V. and хг = yl for all i ʌ except for some index k,
1 < к < n -
- 1. It implies that l(xt^) = l(yt) = i for all i N. We have to consider
the following cases:

(1). If к = 1, then /∕l = xn+1 ⅛ ¢(1). Since l(xn+1~) = n ⅛ 1, we have

<P+x" + ' - ^n+ι > alχn+1 - bt,l = 1, ,n.



More intriguing information

1. AGRIBUSINESS EXECUTIVE EDUCATION AND KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE: NEW MECHANISMS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INVOLVING THE UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE FIRM STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC SECTOR
2. Deprivation Analysis in Declining Inner City Residential Areas: A Case Study From Izmir, Turkey.
3. Financial Markets and International Risk Sharing
4. Testing Hypotheses in an I(2) Model with Applications to the Persistent Long Swings in the Dmk/$ Rate
5. The name is absent
6. Quality Enhancement for E-Learning Courses: The Role of Student Feedback
7. Optimal Tax Policy when Firms are Internationally Mobile
8. Trade Liberalization, Firm Performance and Labour Market Outcomes in the Developing World: What Can We Learn from Micro-LevelData?
9. The name is absent
10. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation