The name is absent



21

Example 9. We are given

-1

-1

-1

3

1

1

A =

1

3

1

1

1

3

Then

0

1

0

U =

0

0

1

-1

-1

-1

such that

1

0

0

-1

2

0

À =

-1

0

2

-3

—2

—2

Now let us give a proof of Theorem 2.2. We are given a polytope which has the
standard form. Since
P contains no integral point, the algorithm terminates with
a completely labeled simplex of type 77, say, σ1(⅛1,π), within a finite number of
steps. Suppose to the contrary that there is another completely labeled simplex of
tpye 77, say, σ2(y1,
p). Without loss of generality we may assume that π is equal to
(1,..., n),
l(xt^) = i for any i ∈ .V. and хг = yl for all i ʌ except for some index k,
1 < к < n -
- 1. It implies that l(xt^) = l(yt) = i for all i N. We have to consider
the following cases:

(1). If к = 1, then /∕l = xn+1 ⅛ ¢(1). Since l(xn+1~) = n ⅛ 1, we have

<P+x" + ' - ^n+ι > alχn+1 - bt,l = 1, ,n.



More intriguing information

1. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals
2. The name is absent
3. Ex post analysis of the regional impacts of major infrastructure: the Channel Tunnel 10 years on.
4. Tariff Escalation and Invasive Species Risk
5. Ability grouping in the secondary school: attitudes of teachers of practically based subjects
6. Education and Development: The Issues and the Evidence
7. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models
8. Transfer from primary school to secondary school
9. Weather Forecasting for Weather Derivatives
10. The Role of Evidence in Establishing Trust in Repositories