21
Example 9. We are given
-1 |
-1 |
-1 | |
3 |
1 |
1 | |
A = |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 | |
Then |
0 |
1 |
0 |
U = |
0 |
0 |
1 |
-1 |
-1 |
-1 | |
such that |
1 |
0 |
0 |
-1 |
2 |
0 | |
À = |
-1 |
0 |
2 |
-3 |
—2 |
—2 |
Now let us give a proof of Theorem 2.2. We are given a polytope which has the
standard form. Since P contains no integral point, the algorithm terminates with
a completely labeled simplex of type 77, say, σ1(⅛1,π), within a finite number of
steps. Suppose to the contrary that there is another completely labeled simplex of
tpye 77, say, σ2(y1, p). Without loss of generality we may assume that π is equal to
(1,..., n), l(xt^) = i for any i ∈ .V. and хг = yl for all i ∈ ʌ except for some index k,
1 < к < n -∖- 1. It implies that l(xt^) = l(yt) = i for all i ∈ N. We have to consider
the following cases:
(1). If к = 1, then /∕l = xn+1 ⅛ ¢(1). Since l(xn+1~) = n ⅛ 1, we have
<P+∖x" + ' - ^n+ι > alχn+1 - bt,l = 1, ■ ■ ■ ,n.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Weather Forecasting for Weather Derivatives
3. Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA
4. Ein pragmatisierter Kalkul des naturlichen Schlieβens nebst Metatheorie
5. Wounds and reinscriptions: schools, sexualities and performative subjects
6. Human Development and Regional Disparities in Iran:A Policy Model
7. ROBUST CLASSIFICATION WITH CONTEXT-SENSITIVE FEATURES
8. KNOWLEDGE EVOLUTION
9. Handling the measurement error problem by means of panel data: Moment methods applied on firm data
10. The name is absent