The name is absent



21

Example 9. We are given

-1

-1

-1

3

1

1

A =

1

3

1

1

1

3

Then

0

1

0

U =

0

0

1

-1

-1

-1

such that

1

0

0

-1

2

0

À =

-1

0

2

-3

—2

—2

Now let us give a proof of Theorem 2.2. We are given a polytope which has the
standard form. Since
P contains no integral point, the algorithm terminates with
a completely labeled simplex of type 77, say, σ1(⅛1,π), within a finite number of
steps. Suppose to the contrary that there is another completely labeled simplex of
tpye 77, say, σ2(y1,
p). Without loss of generality we may assume that π is equal to
(1,..., n),
l(xt^) = i for any i ∈ .V. and хг = yl for all i ʌ except for some index k,
1 < к < n -
- 1. It implies that l(xt^) = l(yt) = i for all i N. We have to consider
the following cases:

(1). If к = 1, then /∕l = xn+1 ⅛ ¢(1). Since l(xn+1~) = n ⅛ 1, we have

<P+x" + ' - ^n+ι > alχn+1 - bt,l = 1, ,n.



More intriguing information

1. LOCAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES TO HELP FARM PEOPLE ADJUST
2. The name is absent
3. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?
4. The name is absent
5. Corporate Taxation and Multinational Activity
6. Should informal sector be subsidised?
7. Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey
8. Female Empowerment: Impact of a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent