20
Then
1 0
-3 1
such that
5 |
-1 |
0 |
1 |
-3 |
0 |
Let b1 = 1, δ2 = 2 and b3 = —1. Then A and A correspond to Example 2 and
Example 4, respectively. See Figure 2 and Figure 4.
Example 8. We are given
P = { x E R2 I ajx ≤ bi, i = 1, 2, 3 }
where ɑɪ = (3, — l)τ, α2 = (—3, 2)τ and α3 = ( —1, — l)τ, b1 = 2, δ2 = —1 and
b3 = 0. See Figure 5 where there are three completely labeled simplices. One of
them is of type II. The other two are of type I. We use the following unimodular
transformation
such that
2 -1
-1 2
—2 -1
Now it is easy to check that the resulting polytope generates no completely labeled
simplex of type II. In fact the Labeling Rule results in three completely labeled
simplices of type I in this case, see Figure 6. Compare Figure 5 with Figure 6.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs
3. PROFITABILITY OF ALFALFA HAY STORAGE USING PROBABILITIES: AN EXTENSION APPROACH
4. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PATENTS AND FIRM LOCATION IN THE SPANISH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INDUSTRY.
8. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
9. Education Research Gender, Education and Development - A Partially Annotated and Selective Bibliography
10. The name is absent