The name is absent



20

Then

1 0

-3 1

such that

5

-1

0

1

-3

0

Let b1 = 1, δ2 = 2 and b3 = —1. Then A and A correspond to Example 2 and

Example 4, respectively. See Figure 2 and Figure 4.

Example 8. We are given

P = { x E R2 I ajx ≤ bi, i = 1, 2, 3 }

where ɑɪ = (3, — l)τ, α2 = (—3, 2)τ and α3 = ( —1, — l)τ, b1 = 2, δ2 = —1 and
b3 = 0. See Figure 5 where there are three completely labeled simplices. One of
them is of type
II. The other two are of type I. We use the following unimodular
transformation
such that

2 -1

-1 2

—2 -1

Now it is easy to check that the resulting polytope generates no completely labeled
simplex of type
II. In fact the Labeling Rule results in three completely labeled
simplices of type
I in this case, see Figure 6. Compare Figure 5 with Figure 6.



More intriguing information

1. Investment in Next Generation Networks and the Role of Regulation: A Real Option Approach
2. ADJUSTMENT TO GLOBALISATION: A STUDY OF THE FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY IN EUROPE
3. A Rare Presentation of Crohn's Disease
4. Sex differences in the structure and stability of children’s playground social networks and their overlap with friendship relations
5. The Values and Character Dispositions of 14-16 Year Olds in the Hodge Hill Constituency
6. The name is absent
7. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability
8. Needing to be ‘in the know’: strategies of subordination used by 10-11 year old school boys
9. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
10. The name is absent