Qualification-Mismatch and Long-Term Unemployment in a Growth-Matching Model



7 Appendix

Lemma 1 Using (12) and (13), then Fκ(k) = (1 + c1 ) r.

Proof. Differentiate (12) w.r.t. time and substitute it in (13), then Fχ (k) =
(1 +
ci) r is implied. ■

Lemma 2 Using (2), (9), (10), cv = cvQe'xt and λ = ʌoeʌt, then Fe(k) = w +
≡yθj
r - λ + β (Ù - V) + у .

Proof. Differentiate (2) w.r.t. V and (9) w.r.t. time, use cv := cvQe'xt and
λ := ʌoeʌt, then

e~rtcυ (r - λ) + 1-β ι + μ1β (Ù - V)] θ- = = 0
ʌ

^ -μι = γ-λ3βe~rtcυ (r - λ) θβ + μ1β (Ù - V) .

Substitute (10) for -/11, then
ʌ

γ-Γβe~rtcυ (r - λ) θβ + μ1β (/ - V) = e-rt [Fe(k) - w] - μ1n

and substitute (9) for μ1, then
ʌ ʌ

c l λi [β (/ - V) + n = Fe(k) - W - c /" θ (r - λ)

1 — βL / J                 1 — β    /

ʌ

^ Fe(k) = w + cυ ʌ r - λ + β - V) + y θβ.

1 — β L                   /     -

Therefore, (16) is implied. ■

Proposition 3 Using (1), (6), (7a), (15), (16) and (20), then the efficient factor

allocation function Φι(k) := —^λ°,∙, ka = θβ follows.
c^λ[{τ+rUka 1+"7-λ]

Proof. Differentiate (7a) w.r.t. E, substitute this and (6) in (16), then

θβ =   (1 - qQ (1 - β)(1 - ш) λ  ka

.             . .      .

cυλ r + β - V) + у - λ

Differentiate (7a) w.r.t. K and substitute this, (15), λ = λoext and cυ = cvqcxt in
the above equation, then

θβ =       (1 - qQ (1 - β) (1 - ʃ) λo      k“

cυ0λ [ɪkɑ-1 + β(/ - V) + n - λ
28



More intriguing information

1. Constrained School Choice
2. Does South Africa Have the Potential and Capacity to Grow at 7 Per Cent?: A Labour Market Perspective
3. What Contribution Can Residential Field Courses Make to the Education of 11-14 Year-olds?
4. PROJECTED COSTS FOR SELECTED LOUISIANA VEGETABLE CROPS - 1997 SEASON
5. The name is absent
6. Non Linear Contracting and Endogenous Buyer Power between Manufacturers and Retailers: Empirical Evidence on Food Retailing in France
7. Weak and strong sustainability indicators, and regional environmental resources
8. The Role of Evidence in Establishing Trust in Repositories
9. The name is absent
10. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt