|
Table 3: Three Stage Least Squares Estimates of t |
ιe Effect of Export Tax Rebates | |||
|
PCompetitor= MAMS |
Pcompetitor = OMILDS | |||
|
Explanatory Variables_______ |
Estimated ______Coefficient |
_______T-Statistic |
Estimated ______Coefficient |
_______T-Statistic |
|
Equations 7.1 and 7.2 where dependent variable is PSantos4______________________________ | ||||
|
Constant_______ |
________-0.01 |
____________0.07 |
0.04 |
____________0.30 |
|
P Competitor__________ |
________0.92* |
___________13.29 |
0.95* |
____________8.88 |
|
Alpha_________ |
________0.42* |
____________7.24 |
0.52* |
____________6.71 |
|
Alpha1972-79 |
_______-0.50* |
____________3.43 |
-0.09 |
____________0.41 |
|
D1977____________ |
_________1.31* |
___________11.42 |
0.99* |
____________4.95 |
|
D1979____________ |
_______-0.35* |
____________4.34 |
-0.42* |
____________3.24 |
|
Relative Supply |
_______-0.45*** |
____________-1.93 |
-0.40 |
____________-1.09 |
|
Durbin-Watson |
____________2.14 |
_____________1.96 | ||
|
Adjusted R2 |
____________0.99 |
____________0.99 | ||
|
Equations 8.1 and 8.2 where dependent variable is PCompetitor____________________________ | ||||
|
Constant_______ |
________0.72* |
____________6.58 |
0.56* |
____________6.08 |
|
P Santos4_____________ |
________0.55* |
____________6.98 |
0.59* |
____________9.46 |
|
Alpha_________ |
________0.02 |
____________-0.19 |
-0.07 |
___________-0.76 |
|
Alpha1972-79 |
________0.31 |
_____________1.06 |
0.01 |
____________0.04 |
|
Relative Supply |
-1.62* |
____________-3.54 |
1.48* |
____________4.03 |
|
Durbin-Watson |
____________2.25 |
_____________1.91 | ||
|
Adjusted R2 |
____________0.83 |
____________0.87 | ||
|
Equations 9.1 and 9.2 where dependent variable is Alpha_______________________________ | ||||
|
Constant_______ |
0.72** |
____________2.03 |
0.61** |
____________2.37 |
|
P Santos4_____________ |
0.59* |
____________2.86 |
0.82* |
____________5.12 |
|
P Competitor__________ |
-1.04** |
____________-2.62 |
-1.31* |
___________-4.77 |
|
D1965-71___________ |
0.04 |
____________0.20 |
0.23 |
_____________1.40 |
|
D1972-79__________ |
0.08 |
____________0.30 |
0.30 |
_____________1.36 |
|
DAVISOS_________ |
0.23 |
_____________1.49 |
0.12 |
____________0.97 |
|
AR(1) |
0.83* |
____________7.02 |
0.84* |
____________7.62 |
|
Durbin-Watson |
____________2.03 |
_____________1.83 | ||
|
Adjusted R2 |
____________0.35 |
____________0.56 | ||
|
Equations 10.1 and 10.2 where dependent variable is Relative Supply | ||||
|
Constant_______ |
0.33* |
____________4.31 |
0.34* |
____________4.97 |
|
P Santos4_____________ |
0.25* |
____________2.87 |
0.33* |
____________4.03 |
|
P Competitor__________ |
-0.45* |
____________-3.93 |
-0.58* |
___________-5.42 |
|
Durbin-Watson |
____________2.36 |
____________2.08 | ||
|
Adjusted R2 |
____________0.13 |
____________-0.15 | ||
|
* ,**, and *** denotes significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% level, respectively.___________ | ||||
32
More intriguing information
1. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?2. Strengthening civil society from the outside? Donor driven consultation and participation processes in Poverty Reduction Strategies (PRSP): the Bolivian case
3. Fortschritte bei der Exportorientierung von Dienstleistungsunternehmen
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Non-farm businesses local economic integration level: the case of six Portuguese small and medium-sized Markettowns• - a sector approach
9. The name is absent
10. Surveying the welfare state: challenges, policy development and causes of resilience