Table 1: Workplace Organization and Practices, Meansa for NES 1993 and 1996
|
Year Variables |
All |
1993 Manuf. |
Non Man. |
All |
1996 Manuf. |
Non Man. |
|
Involvement | ||||||
|
Meeting (% wkrs) |
52.35 |
38.88 |
58.44 |
61.88 |
57.23 |
63.46 |
|
(1.51) |
(1.83) |
(2.53) |
(1.46) |
(1.81) |
(2.58) | |
|
Team (% wkrs) |
12.13 |
10.38 |
12.92 |
19.07 |
18.95 |
19.11 |
|
(0.87) |
(1.04) |
(1.52) |
(1.12) |
(1.38) |
(1.98) | |
|
Job Rot. (% wkrs) |
13.70 |
15.90 |
12.70 |
16.45 |
25.36 |
13.40 |
|
Workplace |
(0.92) |
(1.25) |
(1.49) |
(0.97) |
(1.47) |
(1.51) |
|
# Management Lvls |
2.06 |
1.95 |
2.11 |
1.73 |
2.15 |
1.58 |
|
(0.05) |
(0.05) |
(0.10) |
(0.10) |
(0.20) |
(0.09) | |
|
# Wkrs/Supervisor |
15.28 |
15.54 |
15.16 |
12.62 |
13.98 |
12.16 |
|
(0.68) |
(0.88) |
(1.14) |
(0.45) |
(0.61) |
(0.76) | |
|
Benchmarking |
0.28 |
0.24 |
0.30 |
0.33 |
0.28 |
0.34 |
|
(0.02) |
(0.02) |
(0.03) |
(0.02) |
(0.02) |
(0.03) | |
|
TQM/Re-engineering |
0.35 |
0.40 |
0.29 |
0.32 |
0.29 | |
|
(0.02) |
(0.02) |
(0.03) |
(0.02) |
(0.02) |
(0.03) | |
|
Training Team |
0.53 |
0.50 |
0.54 |
0.70 |
0.65 |
0.72 |
|
Pay |
(0.02) |
(0.02) |
(0.03) |
(0.02) |
(0.02) |
(0.03) |
|
Stock Opt.-Prof. Sha. |
0.77 |
0.74 |
0.79 |
0.46 |
0.51 |
0.44 |
|
(0.01) |
(0.02) |
(0.02) |
(0.02) |
(0.02) |
(0.03) | |
|
All Practices |
0.06 |
0.03 |
0.08 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
|
(0.01) |
(0.01) |
(0.02) |
(0.01) |
(0.01) |
(0.01) | |
|
No Practices |
0.02 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
|
ComputerUse |
(0.00) |
(0.01) |
(0.01) |
(0.00) |
(0.01) |
(0.00) |
|
% Managers |
0.74 |
0.70 |
0.76 |
82.42 |
82.98 |
82.23 |
|
(0.01) |
(0.01) |
(0.02) |
(1.14) |
(1.19) |
(2.14) | |
|
% Others |
0.41 |
0.25 |
0.48 |
61.00 |
33.86 |
70.25 |
|
(0.01) |
(0.01) |
(0.02) |
(1.42) |
(1.35) |
(2.44) | |
|
N_____________ |
816 |
537 |
279 |
765 |
527 |
238_______ |
a-Standard errors in parenthesis.
22
More intriguing information
1. Modelling Transport in an Interregional General Equilibrium Model with Externalities2. Partner Selection Criteria in Strategic Alliances When to Ally with Weak Partners
3. Experience, Innovation and Productivity - Empirical Evidence from Italy's Slowdown
4. The name is absent
5. ISO 9000 -- A MARKETING TOOL FOR U.S. AGRIBUSINESS
6. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
7. Monetary Policy News and Exchange Rate Responses: Do Only Surprises Matter?
8. The name is absent
9. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
10. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification